Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 395 | Thanked: 165 times | Joined on May 2010 @ TMO
#41
No hardware QWERTY? Offer me Swype, and I'd be appeased.

No hardware QWERTY and offer me the same virtual keyboard the N900 has? I'd be very incensed.
 
Posts: 244 | Thanked: 155 times | Joined on Aug 2009 @ DC
#42
Originally Posted by jnwi View Post
Some high end users may want no keyboard, some may want one. Some business users may want none, bb-style, or n97-style. Same for mid range.

I'm glad they offer so many options, and it seems like they're working to keep the internals as similar as possible.
I'm all for options. My list was very broad and general. Lets say in the first 2 phones you have one that has keyboard and one without. That's only an additional 2 to the list with a total of 7, which is still way less then 16.

But, options don't always mean more sales as proven by Apple. Nokia needs to slim down and focus on a few models.

That's just my opinion.

Last edited by sevla; 2010-06-09 at 15:26.
 
benny1967's Avatar
Posts: 3,790 | Thanked: 5,718 times | Joined on Mar 2006 @ Vienna, Austria
#43
Originally Posted by sevla View Post
I don't know why Nokia needs 16 different models. It's harder to support and more difficult to manage internally. I think part of the reason the iPhone is so polished is because that is the only phone Apple works on. Not 16 different iterations of the almost the same thing.
having more models is one of the reasons why nokia has more customers, too. if you don't want a touch screen or need a hardware qwerty keyboard - what does apple have for you?
 
Posts: 244 | Thanked: 155 times | Joined on Aug 2009 @ DC
#44
Originally Posted by benny1967 View Post
having more models is one of the reasons why nokia has more customers, too. if you don't want a touch screen or need a hardware qwerty keyboard - what does apple have for you?
LIke i said.. I'm all for options and I suggested having keyboard vs non keyboard options.

But do we really need 7 different c class phones??
 

The Following User Says Thank You to sevla For This Useful Post:
Posts: 1,096 | Thanked: 760 times | Joined on Dec 2008
#45
Originally Posted by sevla View Post
LIke i said.. I'm all for options and I suggested having keyboard vs non keyboard options.

But do we really need 7 different c class phones??
well, mercedes has about 10 different c-class models

Just kidding.
 
zehjotkah's Avatar
Posts: 2,361 | Thanked: 3,746 times | Joined on Dec 2007 @ Berlin - Love this city!!
#46
Originally Posted by zfarooq View Post
N9 is confirmed to have a keyboard.
yes, but the question is if it's a software- or hardware-keyboard
 
Posts: 1,746 | Thanked: 2,100 times | Joined on Sep 2009
#47
I wonder if Nokia will make the necessary drivers available such that buyers of the N9 will be able to use community builds of MeeGo that allow greater customization than their default.

Hopefully they won't go full ****** on us.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to wmarone For This Useful Post:
mrojas's Avatar
Posts: 733 | Thanked: 991 times | Joined on Dec 2008
#48
Originally Posted by sevla View Post
LIke i said.. I'm all for options and I suggested having keyboard vs non keyboard options.

But do we really need 7 different c class phones??
Not everyone wants the exact same phone of the next guy, and not everyone has the same paycheck. Even in the low end market (and maybe even more because it's low end); variety means a lot.

It's not it's too hard for Nokia to manufacture model with different color or form factor anyway, S40 is cheap, etc etc.
__________________
Hola! Soy un Guía de Maemo!.

Vínculos interesantes si nos visitas por primera vez (en inglés): New members say hello , New users start here, Community subforum, Beginners' wiki page, Maemo5 101, Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Si te puedo ayudar con cualquier otra cosa, sólo dilo!
 
Posts: 174 | Thanked: 69 times | Joined on Jun 2009
#49
a hardware keyboard, the one without the keyboard has been delayed or scrapped.

I dont quite remember where I read it, will try to find it.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to zfarooq For This Useful Post:
tissot's Avatar
Posts: 1,839 | Thanked: 2,432 times | Joined on May 2009
#50
Originally Posted by Kangal View Post
Quite the opposite imo. The more the (MeeGo) devices, the more the adoption of MeeGo will be. And this will drive more developers to the platform and directly/indirectly lead to a vast (and perhaps quality) Application library.

The fact that Qt & Linux can be served in such a cross-platform solution will only multiply that.

For once I see that Apple is actually playing catch-up in its own field. I mean Apple started the smartphone revolution but HTC expanded it with the G1 and Nexus One. So the best chance for MeeGo is today and if it could serve killer hardware, great software integration, include tasty functions (from desktop os linage) and show promise by releasing a tablet (its the craze) with 1:1 App compatibility with the phone device.

These are all possible, perhaps even easy with the tools (Qt), that needs to be available now. As soon as Froyo arrives, iPhone 4 released and the Google tablet is released, things are going to look more obsolete for MeeGo.
More MeeGo phones the better no doubt, but we need to remember that there's Symbian Foundation that's taking the largest bite of the cake in sales. It could be that the MeeGo phones will actually drive the development more in Qt than Symbian thought.

Imo still MeeGo phones should be unique very high end coming from Nokia. Other manufacturers can of course build as many MeeGo phones as they want and it's all great for Nokia and Intel.
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:30.