|
2010-09-03
, 16:16
|
Posts: 1,746 |
Thanked: 2,100 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#42
|
That, and I have serious doubts that an OS built around QT is the future (it seems like a lot of work to accomplish status quo, but that is an assessment based on ignorance). As of now, I'd sooner use a functional Ubuntu tablet (I would actually be interested in this).
|
2010-09-03
, 16:22
|
Posts: 75 |
Thanked: 18 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
@ Malta
|
#43
|
The Following User Says Thank You to fieryriver For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-09-03
, 16:38
|
|
Posts: 501 |
Thanked: 292 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#44
|
The Following User Says Thank You to schettj For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-09-03
, 16:45
|
Posts: 1,033 |
Thanked: 1,013 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#45
|
|
2010-09-03
, 16:46
|
Posts: 1,729 |
Thanked: 388 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Canada
|
#46
|
I would buy an Android one because I am determined not to buy a Nokia device. I have already bought five devices from Nokia and I think that's enough. I don't trust Nokia. As has been pointed out, Nokia seems to be abandoning its devices faster and faster. I'm not interested in being part of that. If I'm going to be betrayed, let it be by another company for a change.
The Following User Says Thank You to gabby131 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-09-03
, 17:31
|
|
Posts: 179 |
Thanked: 115 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ Victoria BC Canada
|
#47
|
|
2010-09-03
, 18:21
|
|
Posts: 702 |
Thanked: 334 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Israel.
|
#48
|
Out of topic.......but i think im on the same path as you are, I just got a non-Nokia deivce as a replacement for my Nokia device.
The Following User Says Thank You to eitama For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-09-03
, 18:26
|
Posts: 307 |
Thanked: 157 times |
Joined on Jul 2009
@ Illinois, USA
|
#49
|
That, and I have serious doubts that an OS built around QT is the future (it seems like a lot of work to accomplish status quo, but that is an assessment based on ignorance). As of now, I'd sooner use a functional Ubuntu tablet (I would actually be interested in this).
|
2010-09-03
, 18:30
|
|
Posts: 702 |
Thanked: 334 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Israel.
|
#50
|
The beauty of Qt is that it address a serious shortcoming in Apple iOS libraries: automated resizing.
Rather than double the size of a pixel to make an iPhone app fit on an iPad screen, a Qt based app would have just seemlessly resized itself.
Ditto for putting iOS on a nano sized device.
Don't get me wrong, it has been a tremendously useful device that I use daily, but I have limited time/desire to muck around in an OS these days just to get it to work properly, and need something that I can pick up and use.
Once is mistake enough for me. I started doing research before jumping into purchases, and thankfully there are wondeful devices out there that are collectively praised.
I am very weary and cautious about MeeGo and a MeeGo device. I would consider it if and only if it a) very highly praised, b) did things that no other device did, and c) I was convinced that it would be supported into the future. These points requires at least two-years of observation, so the first round of MeeGo tablets are out for me.
That, and I have serious doubts that an OS built around QT is the future (it seems like a lot of work to accomplish status quo, but that is an assessment based on ignorance). As of now, I'd sooner use a functional Ubuntu tablet (I would actually be interested in this).