![]() |
2010-11-16
, 09:11
|
Posts: 237 |
Thanked: 274 times |
Joined on Jul 2010
|
#42
|
that's why i started this tread... other s have problems with uboot too.
see this post.
http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=65461
![]() |
2010-11-16
, 09:49
|
Posts: 256 |
Thanked: 92 times |
Joined on Oct 2010
|
#43
|
first , I repeat.... you don't have to use u-boot , stay away from kernel packages in extras-devel .
the thread title is :
N900 kernel v45, why with uboot???
it reflects your opinion that you don't need u-boot ...
assuming you knew what you were doing , you went on and installed kernel-package from extras-devel , knowing that u-boot will be installed as you have read the change log , the title won't be "why with uboot" .
others having problems with u-boot installed the kernel-package from extras-devel without knowing the changes , well it's their fault , they have been warned before about installing software from extras-devel .
and it's not like fixing that is too hard , if you are caught in a reboot loop / kernel doesn't start , just extract the pr1.3 kernel and flash it , then install stable power-kernel version , or extract the power kernel image from .deb of stable version , and flash it , that works too .
or follow instructions by Matan
http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php...270#post870270
if the phone starts , but you just don't like u-boot , installing stable kernel-version will overwrite u-boot .
as posted above , u-boot is there to help you load different kernels from any where without needing to flash them .
multiboot currently wears your oneNAND by flashing new kernel every time you choose a different OS , in the future , multiboot can be used to write boot.scr for u-boot , instead of flashing .
The Following User Says Thank You to lunat For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-11-16
, 21:54
|
Posts: 1,522 |
Thanked: 392 times |
Joined on Jul 2010
@ São Paulo, Brazil
|
#44
|
![]() |
2010-11-16
, 21:57
|
|
Posts: 1,062 |
Thanked: 961 times |
Joined on May 2010
@ Boston, MA
|
#45
|
![]() |
2010-11-16
, 21:59
|
Posts: 1,522 |
Thanked: 392 times |
Joined on Jul 2010
@ São Paulo, Brazil
|
#46
|
![]() |
2010-11-16
, 22:07
|
Posts: 1,729 |
Thanked: 388 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Canada
|
#47
|
![]() |
2010-11-16
, 22:43
|
|
Posts: 670 |
Thanked: 359 times |
Joined on May 2007
|
#48
|
way too much kernel-power thread!
yes im a troll, but we have the overclocking thread. where we can talk all about the kernel
we also have the "report your issues" post to talk about what is the problem in v45 so we can help developers making the kernel stable.
just saying
![]() |
2010-11-17
, 03:27
|
Posts: 362 |
Thanked: 426 times |
Joined on Nov 2010
@ Italy, Lombardia
|
#49
|
Hello,
So my suggestion is, remove that uboot option, if some users want to use that, there is a separate program/download install for it
![]() |
2010-11-17
, 03:55
|
|
Posts: 160 |
Thanked: 33 times |
Joined on May 2010
|
#50
|
![]() |
Tags |
it's raining, noobs |
|
u-boot does /not/ require flashing
not having uboot requires flashing
kerrnel problems are nasty if you can't revert to a fallback kernel, arn't they? bad if you have to flash everytime. uboot has everything that can make that a thing of the past.
uboot provides a solution to the problem you see and is not the problem...