![]() |
2012-05-23
, 07:42
|
Posts: 30 |
Thanked: 4 times |
Joined on May 2012
|
#42
|
![]() |
2012-05-23
, 09:57
|
Posts: 322 |
Thanked: 218 times |
Joined on Feb 2012
|
#43
|
![]() |
2012-05-23
, 13:23
|
Posts: 322 |
Thanked: 218 times |
Joined on Feb 2012
|
#45
|
![]() |
2012-05-27
, 19:34
|
Posts: 100 |
Thanked: 93 times |
Joined on Apr 2012
|
#47
|
![]() |
2012-05-30
, 02:28
|
Posts: 19 |
Thanked: 28 times |
Joined on Oct 2011
|
#48
|
![]() |
2012-05-30
, 02:47
|
Posts: 19 |
Thanked: 28 times |
Joined on Oct 2011
|
#50
|
And that's NOKIA's fault, since MeeGo>>>WP.
Also hardware-wise, L-900 > N9.
So no [real] contest that L900>N9.....but I chose "I don't like any of them" because its the most accurate answer.
I'm beginning to like Android more-and-more, I believe 2.34+ > WP7.5 as long as the device is easily rootable, has unlocked bootloader and custom roms. So without the "product value" I would choose the SGS or EPIC 4G over the L-900 easily. The fact that it has the latest Android 4.0.4 ICS and a AOKP port is just extra incentive.
And that's a 1.5year old device!
Now we've got offerings like Captivate Glide, RAZR/Droid4, One S/X, LG 4X HD, Gnex and NOTE....and even better ones like NOTE2 coming shortly.
I'm flattered