The Following 17 Users Say Thank You to nodevel For This Useful Post: | ||
243kof, abyzthomas, ajalkane, Bundyo, eekkelund, ggabriel, Jordi, juiceme, late88, mattaustin, minimos, mrsellout, OVK, rcolistete, vistaus, Watchmaker, zamorph |
![]() |
2015-01-02
, 15:38
|
|
Posts: 6,436 |
Thanked: 12,701 times |
Joined on Nov 2011
@ Ängelholm, Sweden
|
#42
|
![]() |
2015-01-02
, 15:40
|
Posts: 1,548 |
Thanked: 7,510 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ Czech Republic
|
#43
|
I'm with coderus on this one... I don't want things like e.g., a status bar as I don't need to be checking e.g., the time of the day _all the time_.
The Following User Says Thank You to MartinK For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2015-01-02
, 15:44
|
Posts: 1,548 |
Thanked: 7,510 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ Czech Republic
|
#44
|
With that in mind, I would say that informative-wise, the order is N9 > Jolla > N900 and action-wise, it is Jolla > N9 > N900. Therefore I cannot see how the transition N900->N9 could be described as getting a pointless lock screen.
The Following User Says Thank You to MartinK For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2015-01-02
, 15:45
|
Posts: 728 |
Thanked: 1,217 times |
Joined on Oct 2011
|
#45
|
![]() |
2015-01-02
, 15:47
|
Posts: 752 |
Thanked: 2,808 times |
Joined on Jan 2011
@ Czech Republic
|
#46
|
I think it needs to be added that because of the physical unlock slider most N900 users don't see the lock screen or even more or less don't know it has one (me included).
![]() |
2015-01-02
, 15:54
|
Posts: 123 |
Thanked: 430 times |
Joined on Dec 2013
|
#47
|
![]() |
2015-01-02
, 16:06
|
|
Posts: 562 |
Thanked: 2,744 times |
Joined on Dec 2013
@ Espoo, Finland
|
#48
|
![]() |
2015-01-02
, 16:28
|
Posts: 233 |
Thanked: 532 times |
Joined on Sep 2011
|
#49
|
When you add status bar to that then user experience would be excellent:
https://together.jolla.com/upfiles/1...5875428533.jpg
If I am serious for a moment then Jolla should do something that would show more information on that screen. Keyboard taking too much screen and maybe smaller text or something.
![]() |
2015-01-02
, 16:37
|
|
Posts: 7,075 |
Thanked: 9,073 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Moon! It's not the East or the West side... it's the Dark Side
|
#50
|
BTW, i think you are late for U11![]()
Maybe you're discussing something for U14-U15 ?
![]() |
Tags |
bada rocks, not again!, tags suck!, yes again! |
|
Let's see:
N900
You can see:
- Time
- Date
- Type and number of notifications (no text)
You can do:N9
You can see:
- Time
- Date
- Type, numbers and details of notifications
- Battery status
- Connections status (operator, cellular, wifi)
- Online presence status
- Alarm clock status
You can do:Jolla
What you can see:
- Time
- Date (appears for 3 seconds)
- Type and number of notifications (no text)
- Connection details (wifi, Bluetooth, operator name)
- Alarm clock status
What you can do:With that in mind, I would say that informative-wise, the order is N9 > Jolla > N900 and action-wise, it is Jolla > N9 > N900. Therefore I cannot see how the transition N900->N9 could be described as getting a pointless lock screen.
Note that I am not talking about custom lock screens (the Qt based one on N900 or the Launcher on Jolla). I also never used the N900 lock screen, as I always unlocked it with the side button which brought me straight to the home screen (the same can be now achieved by double-tapping the power button on Jolla).
Last edited by nodevel; 2015-01-02 at 15:23.