Stskeeps
|
2015-11-20
, 21:07
|
|
Posts: 1,671 |
Thanked: 11,478 times |
Joined on Jun 2008
@ Warsaw, Poland
|
#41
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Stskeeps For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2015-11-20
, 21:21
|
|
Posts: 2,355 |
Thanked: 5,249 times |
Joined on Jan 2009
@ Barcelona
|
#42
|
Thanks, but galaxies have fullHD and some even 4k screens, some with hdmi ports, so the dream of plug tv and mouse/kb should be already here, what's up with that?
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to javispedro For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2015-11-20
, 21:22
|
Posts: 2,076 |
Thanked: 3,268 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
|
#43
|
Yeah, maybe I should try one of those at some point.
I guess I should admit that at some point between the N9 and the early Jolla days I gave up on the "phone as mobile computer" thing and eventually bought a MS Surface (the x86 unlocked one) which runs Gentoo quite well.
Half of the reason is that I was completely tired of having to rebuild everything on the phone. Not only different architecture, but different distro, different packaging system, different API versions, ...
With an x86 laptop, I just run the same kernel and user space I run on the rest of my computers. The amount of time saved is a godsend.
In addition, physical pooooooooooooorts.
|
2015-11-20
, 21:29
|
|
Posts: 2,355 |
Thanked: 5,249 times |
Joined on Jan 2009
@ Barcelona
|
#44
|
Sadly this would work with jolla tablet too in worst case scenario (assuming with store down enabling developer mode still works, on phone it needs to call home to some repos to download fingerterm etc)
|
2015-11-20
, 21:31
|
Posts: 2,076 |
Thanked: 3,268 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
|
#45
|
Still has a different distro, packaging system, etc. and most probably I wouldn't be able to use the same kernel and user space I use on my other computers (binary blobs, gfx, etc.).
It's one of the reasons I still prefer if ... Sailfish Tablet was something I could install on top of Gentoo or any other normal Linux distribution.
I'm aware of the many reasons this is not feasible. It's just a wish.
I still remember the GPE https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPE days and how I basically used the "in-device" GPE calendar itself on my desktop after being annoyed by non-existent sync support...
|
2015-11-20
, 21:52
|
|
Moderator |
Posts: 7,109 |
Thanked: 8,820 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Vancouver, BC, Canada
|
#46
|
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to qole For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2015-11-20
, 22:00
|
Posts: 80 |
Thanked: 59 times |
Joined on Aug 2012
|
#47
|
What does this even mean? Even Apple has faltered in recent (enough) history. This is perhaps as inflammatory of a response as I'd ever expect from a scorned lover. Simply stated, it could have gone unsaid because it matters none.
Too bad Tizen has seen a limited release (India, China and Russia so far)
and Ubuntu Touch is seen as a hard failure not even delivering an user experience that's consistent with the prior PR and whatever else Shuttleworth has stated.
And Tizen would be a failure even if compared to just one of the more recent Samsung Galaxy devices.
So give me an example of a "rockstar" set of 120 or less engineers that's: 1) launched a phone, 2) created a SDK, 3) produced an OS, 4) updated their OS, 5) produced libhybris (used by: Ubuntu Touch, WebOS and others) and 6) got tablets out in the hands of core developers.
Be very specific. I'll wait.
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to fk_lx For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2015-11-20
, 22:07
|
Posts: 2,076 |
Thanked: 3,268 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
|
#48
|
I think disruption could only occur through a revolutionary form factor or revolutionary functionality. The most likely avenue to chase in this area is the Internet Of Things; controlling and talking to things around you. But even that is getting fairly saturated.
In my fictional world, people didn't try to rewrite X Server with Wayland and Mir and SurfaceFlinger, they optimised X and compiz and made it modular, so it maintained all of it's cross-platform, cross-network robustness, but also became incredibly fast and beautiful, able to scale from smartwatch displays to vast walls of connected display grids.
And nobody made a Linux kernel fork (Android, grrrr) that fragmented the hardware market for 8 years (so far).
|
2015-11-20
, 22:10
|
|
Posts: 6,436 |
Thanked: 12,701 times |
Joined on Nov 2011
@ Ängelholm, Sweden
|
#49
|
The Following 30 Users Say Thank You to coderus For This Useful Post: | ||
bote, Bundyo, Copernicus, eekkelund, Feathers McGraw, filip.pz, hhbbap, itdoesntmatt, JoOppen, juiceme, JulmaHerra, late88, maluka, MartinK, mattaustin, mosen, mrsellout, nieldk, nodevel, pichlo, pycage, qole, rcolistete, reinob, Shadowdog, szopin, The Wizard of Huz, thedead1440, tortoisedoc, Watchmaker |
|
2015-11-20
, 22:28
|
Posts: 205 |
Thanked: 389 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#50
|
I agree there. This entire emphasis on Android, AOSP, even hybris, all look to me "I have a hammer here and everything looks a nail". Everyone can do that, and everyone will do that -- cheap.
Maybe it's not the right tool...
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to salyavin For This Useful Post: | ||
Tags |
brainfiction, brainstorming, fiction, jolla or iphone, neigh!, unicorn device |
|