|
2011-07-01
, 16:30
|
Posts: 1,067 |
Thanked: 313 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ USA
|
#542
|
Sorry for the late response guys
Here is My log:
First patch :
was made to work on both N900 and Desktop PC
and it is just the one after doing
rm /home/user/.profile
mv /root/.porfile.bak /root/.profile
Second patch : it is just like the first one
but only adds some lines to rc.local
(THE ONE THAT SOME MEMBERS REPORTED IS THE BEST ONE)
Third patch : was recreated by thingonnaspring
changes the second patch from 60 - 100 lines into 10 -15 lines
and added lines to /home/user/.profile
BUT it only works on N900 NOT the Desktop PC
Forth patch : adds values suggested by epitaph (Many times)
But it ruined the ram and battery
Fifths patch (The current one): Removed the values suggested by epitaph
and adds lines to /root/.profile
Bottom line :
I think that adding lines to /home/user/.profile and /root/.profile
will decrease the performance
the patch recreated by thingonnaspring causes troubles for beginers
so added the patch-ALTERNATIVE.tar.gz wich solves the problem
SOOOOOOOOOO:
what do you guys suggest
1-) put thingonnaspring recreated patch + patch-alternative.tar.gz
but remove the /home/user/.profile (wich gives better performance)
this will make the patch works only on N900 not Desktop PC
and it will also make 2 patches
so users may get confused (as i saw in earlier posts)
2-)put the Second patch mentioned in log
and remove /home/user/.profile (wich will give better performance)
this will work on N900 and Desktop PC
and will be easy for begineers (they will not be confused)
IMO i think option 2
because it will be a simple file
it will get activated in 3 lines
there will not be an alternative patch
it will not cause troubles to beginer users
it will give the best performance (also option 1 does)
i don't prefer option1 :
because
there will be 2 patches (default one and the alternative)
users may get confused
noob users will have to use alternative
So what do you think guys ?
i need a vote
so i know what to do
|
2011-07-01
, 16:39
|
Posts: 328 |
Thanked: 72 times |
Joined on Oct 2010
@ Venezuela
|
#543
|
|
2011-07-01
, 17:03
|
Posts: 915 |
Thanked: 57 times |
Joined on Jun 2011
|
#544
|
|
2011-07-01
, 17:23
|
|
Posts: 472 |
Thanked: 195 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
@ India, Mumbai
|
#545
|
|
2011-07-01
, 17:55
|
Posts: 856 |
Thanked: 1,681 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ Aleppo ,Syria
|
#546
|
The Following User Says Thank You to karam For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-07-01
, 19:26
|
|
Posts: 939 |
Thanked: 366 times |
Joined on Dec 2010
@ U.K.
|
#547
|
|
2011-07-01
, 19:48
|
Posts: 1,751 |
Thanked: 844 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Sweden
|
#548
|
The Following User Says Thank You to AlMehdi For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-07-01
, 20:18
|
Posts: 856 |
Thanked: 1,681 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ Aleppo ,Syria
|
#549
|
|
2011-07-01
, 20:29
|
|
Posts: 939 |
Thanked: 366 times |
Joined on Dec 2010
@ U.K.
|
#550
|
Tags |
autobrick, awesome-script, do no install, f***epitaph, install it now, perfect_ n900, script-a-brick, very safe |
|
and option 2 : will make me post only one patch no alternative
with option 1 : i will have to post two patches (becuase some users will not be able to apply the default one
only alternative
i prefer simplicity and the best quality.jst make it simple and faster and make N900 save battery.dat will do....i just love this thread