|
2011-06-17
, 20:49
|
Posts: 1,048 |
Thanked: 979 times |
Joined on Mar 2008
@ SF Bay Area
|
#5502
|
Have you actually used any Japanese phones? They got nice screens and camera, that is all.
Imo the hotspots are in USA, Korea and Scandinavia that got still most of the companies building the networks around globe, but relevance as phone manufacturers and trend setters is nothing like it was in 2000-2007.
People over at Finland where using phones more than anybody else in the globe back in 2006, now they are behind UK. Mostly because of Symbian still having much larger market share than anywhere else.
|
2011-06-17
, 20:50
|
Posts: 49 |
Thanked: 33 times |
Joined on May 2011
@ Manchester
|
#5503
|
Not wrong (especially relative to Redmond and Cupertino), but note that Google don't release source code to all project participants at the same time (which breaks the model a bit IMO).
Err... what? Just get a Blackberry Storm (ha ha) from eBay or something. Am I missing something here?
|
2011-06-17
, 20:54
|
|
Posts: 568 |
Thanked: 969 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Toronto
|
#5504
|
yes!?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haptics
edit: btw i would never buy blackberry or iphone simple as that
|
2011-06-17
, 21:02
|
Posts: 69 |
Thanked: 32 times |
Joined on Apr 2011
|
#5505
|
|
2011-06-17
, 21:08
|
|
Posts: 738 |
Thanked: 983 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ London
|
#5506
|
since when is contributing = earning money?
you may want to learn some basic accounting.
the reason why IBM contributes to Linux is because some companies want to run Linux over IBM's property OSes (AIX, OS/400 or MVS and the like) but still want to make use of the hardware quality of IBM.
IBM's PDF: «it also provides flexibility, choice, and an attractive total cost of ownership that can benefit IBM customers.»
maybe you should learn to read, too?
|
2011-06-17
, 21:10
|
|
Posts: 568 |
Thanked: 969 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Toronto
|
#5507
|
http://www.nokiaconnection.net/event.php
hey boys here there is the time in which there it will be the conference 10.00am - 12.00pm...but my question is this time is GMT+??? is the time in singapore, in australia, in finland, in usa or where?
|
2011-06-17
, 21:13
|
|
Posts: 738 |
Thanked: 983 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ London
|
#5508
|
So, having established that I'm missing something: I'm interested. What is it that I'm missing?
The Following User Says Thank You to erendorn For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-06-17
, 21:28
|
|
Posts: 1,625 |
Thanked: 998 times |
Joined on Aug 2010
|
#5509
|
Well, it's a wild guess, but you can consider that IBM would sell less if they contributed less to Linux (as you quoted, «it also provides flexibility, choice, and an attractive total cost of ownership that can benefit IBM customers.», and customers bring money)
So it is fair to say that IBM earnings are partially caused by the Linux servers attractiveness, and that they effectively earn money from open source.
It's not because you don't sell something that you don't earn money out of it. There are different business models out there.
|
2011-06-17
, 21:36
|
|
Posts: 738 |
Thanked: 983 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ London
|
#5510
|
like you point out yourself, the GNU/Linux business model isn't quite that obvious.
but, let's say a customer buying an IBM System p decides to run GNU/Linux on it. did IBM make money thanks to GNU/Linux?
wouldn't IBM have made even MORE money, had the customer dumbly bought an AIX license (IBM's Unix) and went on renewing the license for the system's lifetime?
this being said, NOKIA is becoming a hardware company too since they are letting Symbian run out and have more or less pulled out of active GNU/Linux development.
does NOKIA's contribution to GNU/Linux help them sell more devices?
Tags |
duke nukem4eva, epic!, harmattan, n-950, nokia diamond, non-believers, rm680, wasteland |
|
you may want to learn some basic accounting.
the reason why IBM contributes to Linux is because some companies want to run Linux over IBM's property OSes (AIX, OS/400 or MVS and the like) but still want to make use of the hardware quality of IBM.
IBM's PDF: «it also provides flexibility, choice, and an attractive total cost of ownership that can benefit IBM customers.»
maybe you should learn to read, too?