pwannell
|
2009-12-03
, 01:05
|
Posts: 116 |
Thanked: 18 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#571
|
|
2009-12-03
, 01:11
|
Posts: 137 |
Thanked: 71 times |
Joined on Mar 2008
|
#572
|
|
2009-12-03
, 01:25
|
Posts: 203 |
Thanked: 68 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
|
#573
|
-Improve the icon quality, and allow the option for the name of the app to be displayed along side the icon when placed on the desktop.
...
- UI could be more polished, I guess that it a person preference though....
|
2009-12-03
, 01:47
|
Posts: 1,283 |
Thanked: 370 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ South Florida
|
#574
|
|
2009-12-03
, 02:03
|
|
Posts: 2,427 |
Thanked: 2,986 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#575
|
Links to files, please!
(EDIT: 'cause I'd like to be another dude running some of your Python apps)
|
2009-12-03
, 02:25
|
Posts: 1,283 |
Thanked: 370 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ South Florida
|
#576
|
See this thread for XTerm customisation tips.
See this thread for re-mapping the keyboard.
|
2009-12-03
, 04:11
|
Posts: 5,335 |
Thanked: 8,187 times |
Joined on Mar 2007
@ Pennsylvania, USA
|
#577
|
|
2009-12-03
, 04:20
|
Posts: 51 |
Thanked: 11 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#578
|
Thanks for the mini-review. I appreciate getting different people's perspectives of the same things (size of the device, keyboard, phone application, etc.). I feel like I can average the many perspectives out in my head and get a better sense of the device, before I possibly buy it.
One follow up question. You say:
What do you not like about the icon quality and the UI?
From the screen shots I've seen it reminds me a lot of the Gnome desktop, from which the sensibility of the Hildon interface for Maemo is in a sense derived (Hildon is a project of Gnome, the most used desktop in Linux--for those who don't know). One of the things I like about Gnome is that the Icons and UI, to me, are not over designed. They look pleasing, but simple and functional. To me this is in contrast to all the other current major desktops, for computers (Windows, OS X, and KDE-- KDE is the other major Linux desktop). To me Windows, OS X, and KDE have all gone in a design direction that is too flashy, too dominated by useless animations, and prefers very cartoony icons. I find this distracting and more about eye candy than function; often giving only the semblance of user-friendliness, without actually being user-friendly. It can be cool at first, but for me becomes annoying quickly.
As you say, it's a matter of personal preference, but I sort of dread what a more "polished" Maemo might mean. So I'd just be curious if you could elaborate more on what you didn't like about the icons and UI in this respect. Thanks.
|
2009-12-03
, 04:27
|
|
Posts: 74 |
Thanked: 38 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#579
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ArmandHammer For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2009-12-03
, 04:49
|
Posts: 1 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#580
|
I question how useful a car crash app is that you need to press save in order to have it save. Not sure there is going to be a lot of time during a crash.
On another note - don't hijack threads.
Tags |
first impressions, fremantle, impressions, initial impressions, maemo, maemo 5, moderator, n900, out of box, out of box experience, please merge, review, shiny |
|