Active Topics
-
The N900 is now 15 years old! (9)
to Nokia N900 by Arno_11 - 1 hr, 47 mins ago -
Sailfish OS for the Motorola Moto G7 Power (XT1955-5) - (ocean) (4)
to SailfishOS by Maemish - 5 days, 14 hrs ago - more...
|
2011-06-20
, 08:07
|
|
Posts: 29 |
Thanked: 11 times |
Joined on Dec 2010
@ Hungary, Szeged
|
#5792
|
http://www.gsmarena.com/nokia_prepar...-news-2794.php
I would bet it's the N9dev, just the Argentinian guy is a dork
I would bet it's the N9dev, just the Argentinian guy is a dork
|
|
2011-06-20
, 08:10
|
|
Posts: 196 |
Thanked: 224 times |
Joined on Sep 2010
@ Africa
|
#5793
|
Originally Posted by uppercase
But you don't get free food and accommodation.
In most countries you can get free education without killing anyone.
|
|
2011-06-20
, 08:18
|
|
Posts: 196 |
Thanked: 224 times |
Joined on Sep 2010
@ Africa
|
#5794
|
Originally Posted by misterc
I have to correct some of this:
until 1/2 a dozen yrs ago, the web server Oracle used was plain dumb Apache, they didn't even hide it.
[...]
that's why redhat has decided NOT to release the code of their updates anymore, so that Oracle would have to reverse engineer the updates from the updated source code & couldn't simply take over the updates in binary anymore...
1)Red Hat did not stop providing the source for updates. They changed how patches in their kernel src.rpm are provided (now as one single large patch, instead of individual patches). In the majority of cases, Red Hat provides the fix in upstream git *first* in any case.
2)Red Hat did not do this because of how Oracle uses Apache (legally, the way Apache is licensed, under a non-copyleft licence), but because Oracle has been taking patches directly from Red Hat's 2.6.18 kernel for RHEL5 and applying them to Oracles 2.6.32 kernel, while advertising it as binary compatible in order to steal customers from Red Hat (by providing support contracts for RHEL to existing Red Hat customers), instead of basing their work on upstream like most respected players.
 |
|
2011-06-20
, 08:33
|
|
Posts: 844 |
Thanked: 521 times |
Joined on Jan 2009
@ UK southampton
|
#5795
|
Originally Posted by benny1967
Do they have a strategy full stop??
Do they have any strategy that works?
|
|
2011-06-20
, 08:35
|
|
Posts: 75 |
Thanked: 112 times |
Joined on Apr 2011
|
#5796
|
Originally Posted by buchanmilne
and don't forget free sex
But you don't get free food and accommodation.
|
|
2011-06-20
, 08:54
|
|
Posts: 233 |
Thanked: 516 times |
Joined on May 2011
|
#5797
|
Originally Posted by NvyUs
Yes , make no sense to show only dev phone. Give wrong message to people. But i still no that retail in septembre.
yup be we knew that any way lol, took little over two months to start shipping the E6
|
|
2011-06-20
, 09:04
|
|
Posts: 418 |
Thanked: 431 times |
Joined on May 2011
|
#5798
|
Originally Posted by Koajwujwer123
Wait till September... That would be bad
Yes , make no sense to show only dev phone. Give wrong message to people. But i still no that retail in septembre.
|
|
2011-06-20
, 09:08
|
|
Posts: 283 |
Thanked: 336 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Germany
|
#5799
|
maybe september is the general availability of the n9 and some markets will get it earlier.
|
|
2011-06-20
, 09:15
|
|
Posts: 26 |
Thanked: 40 times |
Joined on May 2011
@ Close to you
|
#5800
|
Well imo consumer device has to be shown now and delivered before the ElopWindows strategy in October.
 |
| Tags |
| duke nukem4eva, epic!, harmattan, n-950, nokia diamond, non-believers, rm680, wasteland |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 19:29.
Investing resources to keep the value of older devices doesn't cannibalise your new products, it cannibalises your competitors (those who don't support their devices for longer) devices, because it increases your total market share / audience, and drives demand for newer devices (by allowing owners to recoup some value from their old devices).
Nokia should make Harmattan available for N900. Even for a small fee.