Active Topics
-
Sailfish OS for the Motorola Moto G7 Power (XT1955-5) - (ocean) (4)
to SailfishOS by Maemish - 6 hrs, 4 mins ago -
The N900 is now 15 years old! (6)
to Nokia N900 by Macros - 2 days, 2 hrs ago -
F(x)tec Pro1x (QWERTY) for sale (0)
to Buy & Sell by aln00000 - 2 days, 14 hrs ago -
n770 youtube video (0)
to General by nmdv - 6 days, 14 hrs ago - more...
|
2011-04-03
, 08:35
|
|
Banned |
Posts: 3,412 |
Thanked: 1,043 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#52
|
[QUOTE=Kangal;980804][QUOTE=tzsm98;980772]
Originally Posted by abill_uk
Why do you want to make trouble? why dont you make comments that are not derogatory, do you think you are being clever ?.
I think this issue is now being looked at more seriously now this thread has been started ... snip
LMAO!!!
Also ... You are a troll, just look @youravatar
|
|
2011-04-03
, 09:16
|
|
Posts: 248 |
Thanked: 191 times |
Joined on May 2010
@ New Zealand
|
#53
|
Originally Posted by nick.read
While we are on the subject of what would be nice - a "no thanks" as well as a "thanks" would be cool. That would save all the hassle of negative tagging - people could just select "no thanks" to show their negativity towards the post. The ability to tag could be redefined as being those who have received a certain number of "thanks", say one point per "thank", to a score of 100, and every "no thanks" would diminish their total by two points for every "no thanks". Ideally, we could vote on the tags as well - and every tagging that gets a thumbs-up scores a point, with every tagging that gets a thumbs-down scores minus-five points. I am sure that would be a pretty simple matter to implement for all the programmers here.
If you're going to ask for forum or rule changes, start by abiding by the rules. See http://talk.maemo.org/faq.php?faq=vb...q_tmorulestext - Foul language. Note the part about changing spelling and/or language to avoid the filter.
Last edited by mishmich; 2011-04-03 at 20:32. Reason: mistaken word
|
|
2011-04-03
, 09:26
|
|
Posts: 5,795 |
Thanked: 3,151 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Agoura Hills Calif
|
#54
|
Originally Posted by abill_uk
I don't think it's much of an issue and I've never tagged anything on this site.
I think as YOU are one of the bullies on this forum who CONSTANTLY tagg threads should now realise that this IS AN ISSUE,
__________________
All I want is 40 acres, a mule, and Xterm.
All I want is 40 acres, a mule, and Xterm.
 |
|
2011-04-03
, 09:31
|
|
Posts: 1,789 |
Thanked: 1,699 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
|
#55
|
Originally Posted by abill_uk
Ohhkay?
@Kangal:
Why do you want to make trouble? why dont you make comments that are not derogatory, do you think you are being clever ?.
There's a miss-understanding. I was laughing at the comment you posted before, admit it, its funny.
But the person I was calling a troll was tzsm98 since his avatar is of those baby-troll-pen holder I used to own as a kid. It seemed like I was calling you a troll because the text mucked up the "quote and reply" marks and displaced his name with yours >> now fixed!
I wasn't "being clever", it was only a sudden rush of nostalgia.
Besides, can I ask you which comments of mine are derogatory?
Last edited by Kangal; 2011-04-03 at 09:34.
| The Following User Says Thank You to Kangal For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2011-04-03
, 09:40
|
|
Banned |
Posts: 3,412 |
Thanked: 1,043 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#56
|
Originally Posted by Kangal
Sorry mis-understanding there on my behalf, is sooo easy done on here and you know if only everyone could just get along with everyone and not make trouble, this forum would be like it should be... a family get together of like minded people who care about the N900.
Ohhkay?
There's a miss-understanding. I was laughing at the comment you posted before, admit it, its funny.
But the person I was calling a troll was tzsm98 since his avatar is of those baby-troll-pen holder I used to own as a kid. It seemed like I was calling you a troll because the text mucked up the "quote and reply" marks and displaced his name with yours >> now fixed!
I wasn't "being clever", it was only a sudden rush of nostalgia.
Besides, can I ask you which comments of mine are derogatory?
|
|
2011-04-03
, 09:45
|
|
Posts: 724 |
Thanked: 1,255 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
@ Cambridge, UK
|
#57
|
Originally Posted by abill_uk
Do you know for a fact he's done any tagging? Making accusations and bad mouthing others' with no proof is a serious bum move and wont gain you any friends abill_uk.
I think as YOU are one of the bullies on this forum who CONSTANTLY tagg threads should now realise that this IS AN ISSUE,
|
|
2011-04-03
, 09:57
|
|
Posts: 724 |
Thanked: 1,255 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
@ Cambridge, UK
|
#58
|
Originally Posted by abill_uk
To be honest, you're more of a problem than bogus tags. If you don't like what the tags say don't read them. Just like if you don't like what someone says either ignore it or don't. I think you're all making a serious issue out of nothing. Tags in forums are useless unless there is a strict scheme on using them, which is why they should be ignored.
Sorry mis-understanding there on my behalf, is sooo easy done on here and you know if only everyone could just get along with everyone and not make trouble, this forum would be like it should be... a family get together of like minded people who care about the N900.
Anyone with half a brain understood what Kangal was saying, except you. And you jumped on him straight away like an angry dwarf. You're at least 25.2% more offensive than anyone else on the forum and you never say anything interesting. You just argue with people. Get a grip!
 |
|
2011-04-03
, 10:01
|
|
Posts: 186 |
Thanked: 192 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Finland
|
#59
|
Everyone being able to tag (i.e. over 300 posts) should be banned. No one who is posting that much can possibly keep up good quality in his posts, and thus is not contributing to the true purpose of the forum.
300 posts should be enough for everyone. </troll>
300 posts should be enough for everyone. </troll>
__________________
Trout have underwater weapons.
Trout have underwater weapons.
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to juise- For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2011-04-03
, 10:04
|
|
Banned |
Posts: 3,412 |
Thanked: 1,043 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#60
|
Originally Posted by tswindell
YOU are one of the worst offenders on this forum so i strongly suggest you button it go away and present yourself on another thread.
To be honest, you're more of a problem than bogus tags. If you don't like what the tags say don't read them. Just like if you don't like what someone says either ignore it or don't. I think you're all making a serious issue out of nothing. Tags in forums are useless unless there is a strict scheme on using them, which is why they should be ignored.
Anyone with half a brain understood what Kangal was saying, except you. And you jumped on him straight away like an angry dwarf. You're at least 25.2% more offensive than anyone else on the forum and you never say anything interesting. You just argue with people. Get a grip!
I have no time for you in any way or form because of your past history as i have learned to despise you !.
For the record i APOLOGISED to Kangal but YOU would make an issue of anything and everything as you normally do !.
 |
| Tags |
| tag abuse, tag system, tagging |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:16.
thats just stupid and not funny.