Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 113 | Thanked: 54 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ Australia
#51
Originally Posted by Duff View Post
To simplify my question;

does random reboot = signs of trouble?
At an overclocked speed I assume? Have you tried going back to stock speeds and seeing if the reboots persist?
__________________
♦ Nokia N900 (RX-51) ♦ Korean Made ♦ Week 49/2009 ♦
Firmware 10.2010.19-1
 
Posts: 72 | Thanked: 10 times | Joined on Mar 2010
#52
I've been getting random reboots, 4 to count.. i'm gonna wait for another 2-3 more.. if it happens.

I sooo don't wanna tone it back to 600mhz.. im so enjoying the speed of 825mhz
 
Posts: 86 | Thanked: 52 times | Joined on Jan 2010
#53
Originally Posted by Duff View Post
I've been getting random reboots, 4 to count.. i'm gonna wait for another 2-3 more.. if it happens.

I sooo don't wanna tone it back to 600mhz.. im so enjoying the speed of 825mhz
you may have better luck trying the next highest o/c kernel until you find a stable one without crashes/reboots. i personally have been using lehto's undervoltage 800mhz kernel with outstanding speed + good battery life. i had to turn off smartreflex for it to work though.
 
Posts: 1,427 | Thanked: 2,077 times | Joined on Aug 2009 @ Sydney
#54
Originally Posted by Duff View Post
I've been getting random reboots, 4 to count.. i'm gonna wait for another 2-3 more.. if it happens.

I sooo don't wanna tone it back to 600mhz.. im so enjoying the speed of 825mhz
There is a lower voltage 800Mhz kernel if you want to try that.
It runs the cpu at a lower voltage than even in stock form.
So in theory, it actually should produce less heat, use less power. Even at 800Mhz.
 
NokiaRocks's Avatar
Posts: 658 | Thanked: 117 times | Joined on Jan 2010
#55
But after testing the 800 Mhz ulv kernel, I've to say that the 900 mhz one is much snappier and faster.
 
amorek13's Avatar
Posts: 245 | Thanked: 32 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ CT USA
#56
can someone make a stock kernel with 125
 
Posts: 72 | Thanked: 10 times | Joined on Mar 2010
#57
Originally Posted by NokiaRocks View Post
But after testing the 800 Mhz ulv kernel, I've to say that the 900 mhz one is much snappier and faster.
LINK! please!
 
Ronaldo's Avatar
Posts: 682 | Thanked: 208 times | Joined on Jan 2010 @ UK
#58
Originally Posted by NokiaRocks View Post
But after testing the 800 Mhz ulv kernel, I've to say that the 900 mhz one is much snappier and faster.
agreed, after many days with 900mhz i tried ulv 800mhz and its not as snappier as 900
__________________
n900 (UK) Global 3.2010.02.8
 
Posts: 1,427 | Thanked: 2,077 times | Joined on Aug 2009 @ Sydney
#59
Originally Posted by Duff View Post
LINK! please!
It's always the same link to the Lehto's kernel. See my sig.

Also, the 800Mhz ulv kernel can easily be "unlocked" to 1ghz.
 
zvogt's Avatar
Posts: 118 | Thanked: 67 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ Saint Louis, MO, USA
#60
I've run a few different permutations of Lehto's 900 MHz and titan's kernals set to 900 / 950 MHz for several days each over the past full week. No problems with any of them. I've just installed titan's ulv kernal. I immidiately got a spontaneous reboot with my first attempt at 1 GHz, so I've backed down to 950 again. The keyboard feels MUCH cooler. I'm very happy with the work these guys are doing!
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:13.