![]() |
2008-01-10
, 15:10
|
Posts: 333 |
Thanked: 32 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
|
#51
|
![]() |
2008-01-10
, 15:37
|
|
Posts: 1,743 |
Thanked: 1,231 times |
Joined on Jul 2006
@ Twickenham, UK
|
#52
|
![]() |
2008-01-10
, 16:56
|
|
Posts: 1,878 |
Thanked: 646 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ San Jose, CA
|
#53
|
![]() |
2008-01-17
, 02:30
|
|
Posts: 4,783 |
Thanked: 1,253 times |
Joined on Aug 2007
@ norway
|
#54
|
![]() |
2008-01-17
, 02:43
|
|
Posts: 5,478 |
Thanked: 5,222 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ St. Petersburg, FL
|
#55
|
The one advantage most MIDs have over the NIT family: x86 based (that's part of the MID definition, IIRC, but I also think I remember several of the CES MIDs saying they had ARM processors). That isn't going to make me drop everything and buy one, but it IS an advantage.
![]() |
2008-01-17
, 04:08
|
|
Posts: 1,878 |
Thanked: 646 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ San Jose, CA
|
#56
|
In a way, but there are tradeoffs. Notable cost and battery life. Intel wont be catching up to ARM in the super-mobile space for a while yet.