![]() |
2008-02-22
, 20:20
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#52
|
![]() |
2008-02-22
, 21:14
|
|
Posts: 2,853 |
Thanked: 968 times |
Joined on Nov 2005
|
#53
|
There is a "damned if you do...." kind of vibe going on here. If Nokia had developed a proprietary machine, everyone would now be complaining about how it was not open. But since they went with an open OS and applications, everyone complains that they just are not doing enough, or not holding Skype's feet to the fire.
Since Skype only released a linux version with video recently, I think it is a bit much to expect that Nokia should have leverage to force a video version for the IT. As far as suing Skype for not providing software...how do you know that the agreement included video? I would say that Skype delivered a good bit--we can use their software on the IT...yes, video would be nice, but you still can make Skype calls on the tablet.
The Following User Says Thank You to fpp For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2008-02-22
, 22:13
|
|
Posts: 1,878 |
Thanked: 646 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ San Jose, CA
|
#54
|
I don't, but I thought that Texrat's oblique post implied that it did. As always, he seems to know what's up. And, btw, I didn't mean to say that a lawsuit would be necessary. I would think that the threat might be enough, or merely a reminder that the agreement hasn't been followed.