Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 63 | Thanked: 26 times | Joined on Jul 2010 @ Canada
#51
unfortunately, all my experimentation with these parameters didn't provide something that you could even call "ok" picture quality.

I guess there is some other magic that is required in order to get a good picture quality, but I don't know what...
 
Posts: 1,522 | Thanked: 392 times | Joined on Jul 2010 @ São Paulo, Brazil
#52
I wouldn't expect somthing much better than what you can get with Skype, which is still not all that good


With the quality of afforable webcams nowadays, there isn't really much excuse for Nokia having used such a poor quality camera...
 
Posts: 136 | Thanked: 115 times | Joined on Jul 2010 @ Greece
#53
I have a feeling that it is not a case of poor quality camera but a case of too dark glass in front of it when I compare it with other devices.
still the same result...
 
ed00's Avatar
Posts: 277 | Thanked: 215 times | Joined on Dec 2009
#54
Probably this is what everybody want to see http://forums.internettablettalk.com...5&postcount=67
Its running on N810 i guess it would be possible to implement on N900 too.
And according to t_moyashi's blog
http://translate.google.com/translat...00-fmv4l2.html maybe it could work on N900.
 
somedude's Avatar
Posts: 1,312 | Thanked: 736 times | Joined on Sep 2009
#55
Originally Posted by ed00 View Post
Probably this is what everybody want to see http://forums.internettablettalk.com...5&postcount=67
Its running on N810 i guess it would be possible to implement on N900 too.
And according to t_moyashi's blog
http://translate.google.com/translat...00-fmv4l2.html maybe it could work on N900.
the customized shot looks little better than the n900 default camera app shot.
didnt the fcam guys look @ the front camera, anybody knows?

j
 
Posts: 126 | Thanked: 56 times | Joined on Apr 2010
#56
 
nicolai's Avatar
Posts: 1,637 | Thanked: 4,424 times | Joined on Apr 2009 @ Germany
#57
Originally Posted by jprobichaud View Post
Ah, I've found it: I need to install gstreamer0.10-plugins-good-extra for the video balance pipeline to be present...

Now, the following command line works, but the video is still of an ugly green...


Code:
gst-launch v4l2src device=/dev/video1 ! ffmpegcolorspace ! videobalance brightness=0.5 contrast=1.2 ! autovideosink
It's time to experiment with the other settings...

Thanks again!
less greenish
Code:
gst-launch-0.10 v4l2camsrc device=/dev/video1 driver-name=omap3cam ! ffmpegcolorspace ! autovideosink
 

The Following User Says Thank You to nicolai For This Useful Post:
Banned | Posts: 3,412 | Thanked: 1,043 times | Joined on Feb 2010
#58
What do you expext from a 0.3 mp camera? no way will this give anything but bad results in comparison with the 5 mp rear camera.

Light will be an important factor here and i bet if you use the front camera with a massive amount of light on the subject the picture will not be green.
 
Posts: 1,522 | Thanked: 392 times | Joined on Jul 2010 @ São Paulo, Brazil
#59
Originally Posted by abill_uk View Post
What do you expext from a 0.3 mp camera? no way will this give anything but bad results in comparison with the 5 mp rear camera.
I've seen a lot of 0.3mp cameras that give you way higher quality images than what you get with the N900's "webcam" , most of them were made before the N900 was even getting designed.
 
Banned | Posts: 3,412 | Thanked: 1,043 times | Joined on Feb 2010
#60
You will probably find the front 0.3 camera was added at a later stage in development because they obviously gave the rear camera priority.

No support for front camera should tell you something, the lux factor is too high and they could not get it to work anything like the previous 0.3 cams used so gave up on the idea and left it in place on the finished product.

Sham by Nokia in this case.
 
Reply

Tags
front camera


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:58.