retsaw
|
2010-10-31
, 02:45
|
Posts: 701 |
Thanked: 585 times |
Joined on Sep 2010
@ London, England
|
#51
|
The Following User Says Thank You to retsaw For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-10-31
, 02:48
|
|
Posts: 511 |
Thanked: 128 times |
Joined on Aug 2010
@ Trinidad and Tobago
|
#53
|
|
2010-10-31
, 02:55
|
Posts: 701 |
Thanked: 585 times |
Joined on Sep 2010
@ London, England
|
#54
|
|
2010-10-31
, 03:03
|
Posts: 256 |
Thanked: 92 times |
Joined on Oct 2010
|
#55
|
|
2010-10-31
, 07:15
|
|
Posts: 511 |
Thanked: 128 times |
Joined on Aug 2010
@ Trinidad and Tobago
|
#56
|
|
2010-10-31
, 08:35
|
|
Posts: 1,169 |
Thanked: 1,174 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ sunderland
|
#57
|
The Following User Says Thank You to leetut For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-10-31
, 13:12
|
Posts: 256 |
Thanked: 92 times |
Joined on Oct 2010
|
#58
|
umount /dev/mmcblk0p1 mount /dev/mmcblk0p1
|
2010-10-31
, 16:42
|
|
Posts: 511 |
Thanked: 128 times |
Joined on Aug 2010
@ Trinidad and Tobago
|
#59
|
|
2010-10-31
, 17:04
|
Posts: 701 |
Thanked: 585 times |
Joined on Sep 2010
@ London, England
|
#60
|
I looked at /dev/mmcblk0p1 and mmcblk0p1 is 0bytes large. Is this normal?
also there is a broken symlink called core...
hmmmm