The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to Stskeeps For This Useful Post: | ||
Andre Klapper, don_falcone, Estel, fw190, inean, javispedro, mrsellout, qgil, SD69, sjgadsby, Texrat, timoph |
![]() |
2012-04-05
, 13:46
|
Posts: 1,513 |
Thanked: 2,248 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ US
|
#52
|
![]() |
2012-04-06
, 06:39
|
|
Posts: 1,671 |
Thanked: 11,478 times |
Joined on Jun 2008
@ Warsaw, Poland
|
#53
|
We'll try to set up a meeting on the 10th, it wasn't directly decided as noted in the e-mail but we'll probably have a sync to move things forward. Mer-general archive and information is at http://wiki.merproject.org/wiki/Mailing_lists
Hi,
As mentioned below here is the Agenda for the next meeting in #mer-meeting
at 16:00 UTC on 10 April
1. Current status of Maemo community OBS
2. Mer NFP Status including progress on Donation/Sponsorship Procedures
3, Legal Entity Progress
4. Plasma Active Update on proposed plans for new Repos
5, Harmattan/Fremantle Targets
If you would like to add anything to the agenda please let me know.
BR
vgrade
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Stskeeps For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2012-04-07
, 00:34
|
Posts: 2,802 |
Thanked: 4,491 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
|
#54
|
I'd say it's working as it should be if I understood correctly (please correct me if I didn't) what you did - took package from diablo and made it available for fremantle thus making you the package's maintainer for fremantle.
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to lma For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2012-04-07
, 02:05
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#55
|
![]() |
2012-04-07
, 02:22
|
|
Posts: 2,355 |
Thanked: 5,249 times |
Joined on Jan 2009
@ Barcelona
|
#56
|
Then someone else came along and uploaded new versions (I didn't mind at all btw, that's not the point) from a different account but without remembering to change the Maintainer field: and the system accepted them just fine and gave me credit for those too :-/
![]() |
2012-04-07
, 04:14
|
|
Posts: 5,028 |
Thanked: 8,613 times |
Joined on Mar 2011
|
#57
|
Guys, again: it's great that we're all passionate one way or another about this or that aspect of the discussion, but I ask again that the rhetoric come down and stay down a few hundred degrees. There's just no point in picking at old wounds, especially when the causes look to be more perceived than real anyway, and pissing contests are better held in Off Topic..
Thanks for your understanding. I really, really don't want to moderate this thread.
The Following User Says Thank You to Estel For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2012-04-08
, 00:24
|
Posts: 1,269 |
Thanked: 3,961 times |
Joined on May 2011
@ Brazil
|
#58
|
This would also be a way to clean the queue now unless there are clear cases of packages that should be promoted. Anyway, I'd put the packages that have been in the queue and unlocked for a long time under a microscope and reject them even for small issues since most likely those packages will not receive fixes anymore.
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to rcolistete For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2012-04-08
, 01:53
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#59
|
Appreciating Your good will (no irony here), but what exactly are You referring to? It seems to me, that this thread is quite meritocratic, and much less emotional than "council Election" was just few pages ago.
If You don't want to "point finger at", I'll also be happy via PM answer with example. Really, I'm not trying to argue/being ironical, just wanting to understand what You exactly mean.
/Estel
![]() |
2012-04-08
, 10:21
|
Posts: 415 |
Thanked: 732 times |
Joined on Jan 2009
@ Finland
|
#60
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to timoph For This Useful Post: | ||
We'll try to set up a meeting on the 10th, it wasn't directly decided as noted in the e-mail but we'll probably have a sync to move things forward. Mer-general archive and information is at http://wiki.merproject.org/wiki/Mailing_lists
Some problems:
1) Cost of hardware and handling donations, including checks and balances, setup of legal entities
2) Legal implications (who gets the nastygrams) if we distribute patented or otherwise copyrighted material we aren't permitted to distribute because of a user uploading it.
3) Who contributes and maintains support for the various build targets (Mer, MeeGo, Harmattan, Fremantle) within the OBS.
For 2), from Mer point of view, we're a proper open source project (soon with some non-profit established) with no legal department or corporate hosts that can easily fight back when we get attacked because of random-user's upload of some pirated ROM in a N900 NES emulator to a community OBS.
That is also noted in the minutes that we're working to find a way to do this without risking Mer's core mission and Mer's ability for others to build upon it without worrying it'll go away due to a legal threat.
The other side of the coin is that such shared services are needed to properly grow communities, because in this world, it's not enough to just put up a repository, you need to provide security updates, make it easy to find the software, not just your typical output of a SDK.
Last edited by Stskeeps; 2012-04-05 at 13:00.