Active Topics
-
Camera phone competition March 2023 "Endless" (35)
to General by Maemish - 1 day, 12 hrs ago -
TLS 1.2 for N9 is ready (28)
to MeeGo / Harmattan by smartblu9 - 1 day, 13 hrs ago -
Maemo repository (3)
to Community by torsen - 2 days, 5 hrs ago -
Error after installing Leste on sdcard (11)
to Maemo 7 / Leste by Maemish - 3 days, 3 hrs ago -
Introducing ubiboot N9 (multiboot OS loader) (1,393)
to Alternatives by smatkovi - 4 days, 9 hrs ago - more...
 |
|
2014-11-10
, 14:56
|
|
Posts: 1,023 |
Thanked: 4,421 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Argentina
|
#52
|
Originally Posted by karthick
We are in 1.0.3 now, and you will get 1.0.4 this week with more fixes and the new stupid "read" function included.
the whatsup version 0.3.4b works perfecting well in all waysand is stable the oly prob with it is we canot set prof pic..tats all
the new version of whatsup 1.0.0 is not good
| The Following 15 Users Say Thank You to CepiPerez For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2014-11-10
, 16:55
|
|
Posts: 92 |
Thanked: 39 times |
Joined on Jan 2014
|
#53
|
Originally Posted by CepiPerez
That's because you can share with more than one person now. If you want to share something to one person only, then use the conversation send media function. It's faster than use share function.
i know this but is not a viable solution if you have many pictures that look almost the same/made in same place but different positions/same colour/etc , you always need to enter gallery and remember the name of exactly picture you wanna send because in conversation send media function you cant see fullscreen of picture/ preview picture.
Anyway i said this because i think was more practical default share options to be only for one person like in 1.0.2 was and add another option in settings to be like in 1.0.3 for more than 1 person or one option in settings to change the share style, for 1 person or for more.
These are only suggestions, i dont say how to do your job. Peace.
Waiting for 1.0.4 version.
|
|
2014-11-10
, 18:42
|
|
Posts: 1,023 |
Thanked: 4,421 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Argentina
|
#54
|
Originally Posted by youFailed
For this case, maybe adding a preview using long press can be a better solution. What do you think?
i know this but is not a viable solution if you have many pictures that look almost the same/made in same place but different positions/same colour/etc , you always need to enter gallery and remember the name of exactly picture you wanna send because in conversation send media function you cant see fullscreen of picture/ preview picture.
Anyway i said this because i think was more practical default share options to be only for one person like in 1.0.2 was and add another option in settings to be like in 1.0.3 for more than 1 person or one option in settings to change the share style, for 1 person or for more.
These are only suggestions, i dont say how to do your job. Peace.
Waiting for 1.0.4 version.
| The Following User Says Thank You to CepiPerez For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2014-11-10
, 19:49
|
|
Posts: 56 |
Thanked: 13 times |
Joined on Mar 2012
@ Novosibirsk, Russia
|
#55
|
Originally Posted by coderus
Just out of curiosity: messaging does support group chats (e.g. in skype), why they won't work with whatsup?
@pishta74 integrate in messaging and loose group chats, broadcasts and many other nice features? No, thanks
 |
|
2014-11-10
, 19:56
|
|
Posts: 6,436 |
Thanked: 12,701 times |
Joined on Nov 2011
@ Ängelholm, Sweden
|
#56
|
@Loginin just check features messaging app provide and whatsapp client have. Have any questions?
|
|
2014-11-10
, 20:09
|
|
Posts: 109 |
Thanked: 59 times |
Joined on Apr 2012
|
#57
|
long press on group picture in a group details no longer opens the large preview (size like the picture size on view profile details for a contact)
|
|
2014-11-11
, 05:24
|
|
Posts: 56 |
Thanked: 13 times |
Joined on Mar 2012
@ Novosibirsk, Russia
|
#58
|
Originally Posted by coderus
I understand that Whatsapp is richer in features. The real question is what maximal set of features messaging app internally supports. The set of features in messaging varies significantly from service to service, so it is not obvious what is possible and what is not (some services support attachments, some not, etc.) You as an author of extaplugins most probably know this and that is why I asked.
@Loginin just check features messaging app provide and whatsapp client have. Have any questions?
Last edited by Loginin; 2014-11-11 at 05:29.
|
|
2014-11-11
, 07:05
|
|
Posts: 92 |
Thanked: 39 times |
Joined on Jan 2014
|
#59
|
Originally Posted by CepiPerez
that will be a great feature if dosent cause any conflict . i say is the best option and practical .
For this case, maybe adding a preview using long press can be a better solution. What do you think?
|
|
2014-11-11
, 10:03
|
|
Posts: 6,436 |
Thanked: 12,701 times |
Joined on Nov 2011
@ Ängelholm, Sweden
|
#60
|
@Loginin in that case nobody is interesting in making client which can't provide all features protocol have.
| The Following User Says Thank You to coderus For This Useful Post: | ||
Filebox / FileCase for Maemo / Harmattan / Sailfish
FlowPlayer for Maemo / Harmattan / Sailfish
Whatsup for Harmattan / Sailfish
CallBlocker for Harmattan
Support my work:
Paypal / Bitcoin