The Following User Says Thank You to chenliangchen For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2016-09-05
, 16:39
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#52
|
If you got 500 people willing to pay upfront, I think you would be doing well...
Honestly, I think going down the hardware route is a bad idea. It nearly bankrupted Jolla twice (phone and tablet), the Neo900 project is 3 years old and still nothing, etc.
I think it would be better to take an existing piece of hardware and get a build of Sailfish that works 100% on it. I know there are lots of community ports, but they always seem to get abandoned with some key functions of the phone not working or stable.
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2016-09-05
, 16:52
|
Posts: 702 |
Thanked: 2,059 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
@ UK
|
#53
|
The Following User Says Thank You to aegis For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2016-09-05
, 17:08
|
Posts: 440 |
Thanked: 2,256 times |
Joined on Jul 2014
|
#54
|
1) Start with an almost off the shelf design they have that can be a base port.
2) sell n hundred / thousand
3) do the niche versions with keyboards / huge batteries / big screens / small screens / IR ports / fins
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to r0kk3rz For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2016-09-05
, 17:18
|
|
Posts: 654 |
Thanked: 2,368 times |
Joined on Jul 2014
@ UK
|
#55
|
I think it would be better to take an existing piece of hardware and get a build of Sailfish that works 100% on it. I know there are lots of community ports, but they always seem to get abandoned with some key functions of the phone not working or stable.
The Following User Says Thank You to Feathers McGraw For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2016-09-05
, 17:30
|
Posts: 702 |
Thanked: 2,059 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
@ UK
|
#56
|
Speccing up a cheap aqua fish style device with 4" screen would be a good start
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to aegis For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2016-09-05
, 17:45
|
Posts: 440 |
Thanked: 2,256 times |
Joined on Jul 2014
|
#57
|
Which brings me back to the first post. How hard would that be?
Surely we could come up with a list of components that would be the least trouble to port to?
eg. CPU: Snapdragon 615, Camera Sensor: Sony IMX300... etc
|
2016-09-05
, 17:49
|
Posts: 702 |
Thanked: 2,059 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
@ UK
|
#58
|
Realistically, it would have to be easily repairable too, which most modern phones aren't...but Fairphone 2 is
|
2016-09-05
, 17:57
|
Posts: 702 |
Thanked: 2,059 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
@ UK
|
#59
|
The Following User Says Thank You to aegis For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2016-09-05
, 18:05
|
Posts: 440 |
Thanked: 2,256 times |
Joined on Jul 2014
|
#60
|
So is the Fairphone 2 which presumably isn't getting Android 7 due to the lack of OpenGL 3.1 or Vulkan if I've read the news correctly as to why the Sony Z3 family (also Snapdragon 801) wasn't getting 7.
If we are outsourcing HW, I don't think it can beat some devices here, as sony XZ or compact, for instance.
Another difficulty is the cost - how to make the build profitable. If we have a few engineers spending weeks working on a stable build with Alien Dalvik, how many copies he is going to "sell" to make the whole development profitable and sustainable? And how much should each copy's price be?