The Following User Says Thank You to vitaly_repin For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-12-20
, 11:28
|
|
Posts: 290 |
Thanked: 165 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#602
|
![]() |
2009-12-20
, 15:45
|
|
Posts: 17 |
Thanked: 7 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Gouda, Netherlands
|
#603
|
Point is taken.
Just small comment. N900 does not have java and MMS inside. Nobody cares.
![]() |
2009-12-20
, 20:10
|
Posts: 9 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#604
|
![]() |
2009-12-21
, 00:49
|
Posts: 8 |
Thanked: 5 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#605
|
![]() |
2009-12-21
, 12:53
|
Posts: 71 |
Thanked: 33 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Munich, Germany
|
#606
|
![]() |
2009-12-21
, 13:09
|
|
Posts: 320 |
Thanked: 763 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Espoo, FInland
|
#607
|
Today I have managed to bring the e-mail client of Web OS to use ‘Smart Reply’ instead of standard reply. I just had to edit a java script file.
I don't know much about Maemo. Is there a possibility to edit such a file inside the N900 too, to have MfE use Smart Reply? It already uses Smart Forward, so I am confident…
![]() |
2009-12-21
, 13:11
|
Posts: 9 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#608
|
![]() |
2009-12-21
, 13:29
|
|
Posts: 850 |
Thanked: 626 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Vienna, Austria
|
#609
|
Not sure what you mean here.
No way to bring MfE to smart reply? Even not with "deeper" modification?
![]() |
2009-12-21
, 13:30
|
Posts: 9 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#610
|
![]() |
Tags |
activesync, certificate, email, exchange, fremantle, ignore tex14, maemo 5, mail for exchange, mfe, n900, provisioning, sync, thanks vitaly! |
|
It answers to your questions about Google and nuevasync.
Unfortunately, recently it was merged with existing thread and the most important message is not the very first anymore.
I can confirm that N900 MfE does not pull over all fields per EAS protocol specs, it works only with the fields which are supported by the device itself. E.g., it makes no sense to retrieve the list of blacklisted applications from the server (the list of apps which are not allowed to be executed by server administrator) as there is no support for this functionality in the device (which is linux device, not Windows device).
If the problem occurs with legacy Exchange 2007, then provide more data, pls.
Thank you for the feedback.