![]() |
2011-07-22
, 10:30
|
|
Posts: 738 |
Thanked: 983 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ London
|
#601
|
![]() |
2011-07-22
, 10:48
|
Banned |
Posts: 3,412 |
Thanked: 1,043 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#602
|
MS will most likely provide support and marketing and stuff, but Nokia will still pay royalties for WP7... (that's the revenue part of the partnership for MS, so it's unlikely that it will disapear)
![]() |
2011-07-22
, 11:01
|
Posts: 241 |
Thanked: 324 times |
Joined on Dec 2010
|
#603
|
How do you work that one out when Elop is the CEO and Nokia will only be making the hardware, unless someone is very stupid i very much doubt Microsoft will want or even need royalties from a partner ? even if sold under the name of Nokia.
It all depends i guess on the partnership contract.
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to hotnikkelz For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2011-07-22
, 12:07
|
|
Posts: 738 |
Thanked: 983 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ London
|
#604
|
How do you work that one out when Elop is the CEO and Nokia will only be making the hardware, unless someone is very stupid i very much doubt Microsoft will want or even need royalties from a partner ? even if sold under the name of Nokia.
It all depends i guess on the partnership contract.
As a result of the deal, Nokia will pay Microsoft royalties for the Windows Phone platform, starting only when the Finnish company launches its first Windows Phone devices. Microsoft has also agreed to make payments to Nokia “measured in the billions of dollars” for services but also intellectual property royalties.
![]() |
2011-07-22
, 20:52
|
|
Posts: 4,672 |
Thanked: 5,455 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Springfield, MA, USA
|
#605
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to danramos For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-07-22
, 22:26
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#606
|
It's over. Just admit it already. Elop has infiltrated Nokia and he's begun his treacherous reign by swearing fealty to Microsoft on behalf of everyone in the company. Ruinous lowlife.
Gerbick man you got to agree surely and as i do read your posts with great interest sometimes i might add, the arguments are well ott sorry to say.
![]() |
2011-07-23
, 01:14
|
|
Posts: 4,672 |
Thanked: 5,455 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Springfield, MA, USA
|
#607
|
I always take the "vampire rule" in regards to infiltration - think: Lost Boys.
If he was invited in, the damage made should be blamed on the person(s) inviting that entity in... I'm still stuck on blaming the board of directors for inviting in Elop.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to danramos For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2011-07-23
, 03:47
|
Posts: 241 |
Thanked: 324 times |
Joined on Dec 2010
|
#608
|
I've also played with build 7661 of Mango. Allow me to say that it brings some nice things to the table; still not ready for primetime.
![]() |
2011-07-23
, 05:04
|
|
Posts: 194 |
Thanked: 172 times |
Joined on Jan 2011
@ Sydney, Australia
|
#609
|
|
2011-07-23
, 05:24
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#610
|
Explain further if you don't mindI'd like to hear the shortcomings as you sound like you have particular needs
![]() |
Tags |
balmer was here, e6 rox, elop rox, elop snopp, elop's fool, the elop flop |
|