The Following User Says Thank You to istarskyypsilon For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-04-04
, 17:02
|
Posts: 202 |
Thanked: 30 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
@ CZE
|
#622
|
anyone else noticed the 930mhz/500mhz dsp idles quite high compared to the 900mhz???
i noticed that even when idle the 930mhz will be sitting in a high frequency range surely meaning more wear on the processor and creating more heat and worse battery
i personally think the 800mhz or 900mhz is safest depending on what you use your n900 for if you need the extra power great but i would think that 900mhz setting would be more the adequote for most users if not all users
for the gains you get from the 930mhz compared to the 900mhz and the idle speeds of the two id stick with the 900mhz :-)
just what ive noticed over the last 24 odd hours
|
2010-04-04
, 17:03
|
|
Posts: 682 |
Thanked: 208 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ UK
|
#623
|
very interestin thread have read through it believe it or not...
I have waited for overclocking the N900 but didnt have the necessary knowledge ;-)
However i want to run experiments on the battery consumption using battery graph. I thought about testing the 125-800mhz and 125-900mhz kernels in different scenarios ( i mean like video playback/audio playback/web browsing/streaming/standby)
Please suggest your applications of interest and what kernel mods you'd like to have tested. I dont want to test extreme settings though, just the moderate ones which may be better than the original setting in everyday use.
Also give me advise which applications would be strongly affected by increased processor speed but without dsp speed up.
If battery life will remain pretty much the same with moderate oc i am lookin forward to use them constantly. btw big thanks Letho!
|
2010-04-04
, 17:09
|
|
Posts: 857 |
Thanked: 362 times |
Joined on Feb 2009
@ London
|
#624
|
|
2010-04-04
, 17:27
|
|
Posts: 682 |
Thanked: 208 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ UK
|
#625
|
|
2010-04-04
, 17:45
|
Posts: 59 |
Thanked: 7 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#626
|
|
2010-04-04
, 17:47
|
|
Posts: 321 |
Thanked: 366 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Hellas
|
#627
|
|
2010-04-04
, 17:48
|
|
Posts: 682 |
Thanked: 208 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ UK
|
#628
|
|
2010-04-04
, 17:59
|
|
Posts: 345 |
Thanked: 72 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Reunion Island
|
#629
|
anyone else noticed the 930mhz/500mhz dsp idles quite high compared to the 900mhz???
i noticed that even when idle the 930mhz will be sitting in a high frequency range surely meaning more wear on the processor and creating more heat and worse battery
i personally think the 800mhz or 900mhz is safest depending on what you use your n900 for if you need the extra power great but i would think that 900mhz setting would be more the adequote for most users if not all users
for the gains you get from the 930mhz compared to the 900mhz and the idle speeds of the two id stick with the 900mhz :-)
just what ive noticed over the last 24 odd hours
|
2010-04-04
, 18:02
|
|
Posts: 682 |
Thanked: 208 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ UK
|
#630
|
|
I have waited for overclocking the N900 but didnt have the necessary knowledge ;-)
However i want to run experiments on the battery consumption using battery graph. I thought about testing the 125-800mhz and 125-900mhz kernels in different scenarios ( i mean like video playback/audio playback/web browsing/streaming/standby)
Please suggest your applications of interest and what kernel mods you'd like to have tested. I dont want to test extreme settings though, just the moderate ones which may be better than the original setting in everyday use.
Also give me advise which applications would be strongly affected by increased processor speed but without dsp speed up.
If battery life will remain pretty much the same with moderate oc i am lookin forward to use them constantly. btw big thanks Letho!