Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 273 | Thanked: 463 times | Joined on May 2011 @ Athens
#661
Originally Posted by Lumiaman View Post
Even if they sell anything, its a success for NOKIA. There is currently ZERO Nokia presence in the US.
LOL that is Elops master plan gain 0.003% of the US market. lose the rest of the world live on dumbphones and MS money. Nokia wont have to spend a dollar on R&D.
 
Guest | Posts: n/a | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on
#662
There is still time to join a Bible study group. Humility is a good virtue.
 
Dave999's Avatar
Posts: 7,075 | Thanked: 9,073 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Moon! It's not the East or the West side... it's the Dark Side
#663
http://sammyhub.com/2012/03/28/galax...million-units/

Samsung will rule the smartphone world the next year's. Even the its not a smartphone its not a tablet selling very well. To bad n9 or lumia 900 don't have that formfactor.
 
daperl's Avatar
Posts: 2,427 | Thanked: 2,986 times | Joined on Dec 2007
#664
Originally Posted by Chuck Norris View Post
http://sammyhub.com/2012/03/28/galax...million-units/

Samsung will rule the smartphone world the next year's. Even the its not a smartphone its not a tablet selling very well. To bad n9 or lumia 900 don't have that formfactor.
As Nokia was staring at the iPhone, Samsung snuck up from behind and wacked them in the back of the head.
__________________
N9: Go white or go home
 
misterc's Avatar
Posts: 1,625 | Thanked: 998 times | Joined on Aug 2010
#665
Originally Posted by MINKIN2 View Post
[...] Gotta wait and see I suppose.
have been waiting and seeing nothing from m$ phone wise for a long time, haven't we?
why should that change?
'cuz the most laugh at manufacturer decided to doom itself with it?
how would that work out?
__________________
information is a necessary though no sufficient condition to rationality...
 
misterc's Avatar
Posts: 1,625 | Thanked: 998 times | Joined on Aug 2010
#666
Originally Posted by danramos View Post
The deal you make is to pay $100... for a 2-year service contract. So yeah--go ahead and pay the $100 but you're stuck for TWO YEARS with what is already a pretty low-specifications device that might not even be able to run Windows Phone 8 (it hasn't been communicated that it can).

Also...
it's called market equilibrium...
when a product is not sought after (demand low), price falls
for mobile phones, there is usually an initial period during which the price to pay, even with a contract, is higher (new products, bleeding edge and what not...)
then, as ppl get used to the product, other products with comparable or better features come out, the prices fall...

apparently, here, they didn't even bother with the initial phase ¦-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

as you pointed out yourself, the products technology is pretty much from yesteryear, the design looked cute a year ago or so, when it was 1st seen with the N9 and, well.... NOKIA
NOKIA?


EDIT: with that combo, it will take a miracle for Lumia 900 not to fail
__________________
information is a necessary though no sufficient condition to rationality...

Last edited by misterc; 2012-04-09 at 20:34. Reason: miracle :D
 
daperl's Avatar
Posts: 2,427 | Thanked: 2,986 times | Joined on Dec 2007
#667
This thread should be in Competitors (?), not Off Topic.

Please move it there. Thank you.
__________________
N9: Go white or go home
 
daperl's Avatar
Posts: 2,427 | Thanked: 2,986 times | Joined on Dec 2007
#668
There's nothing better than a ringing endorsement from ars technica.

The Nokia Lumia 900: A good phone at a great price that you probably shouldn't buy

The Nokia Lumia 900 is a good phone. It looks*great and comes at a fantastic price: between $0 and $99 on contract or about $450 contract-free. Unfortunately, you probably shouldn't buy it.

The problem isn't the phone hardware. Although its specifications are not the highest, the phone is reasonable for the price, and in practice it remains fast and fluid for everyday tasks.

Nor is the problem the phone software, at least, not as such. Windows Phone 7.5 is, for the most part, a well constructed, slick operating system. It's not perfect, and there are gaps that I'd like filled (for example, I'd like support for VoIP applications), but it's eminently livable. Nokia's unique applications—Drive, Transit, Maps—are all valuable additions that greatly enrich the platform.

No, the problem is, well, the future. Unlike the dumbphones of yore, smartphones are chock full of complex software; software that has bugs, and software that doesn't necessarily do everything that you might want. But this is OK, because it also gets better. Bugfixes are released, new features are added, APIs are extended to enable more powerful applications, and the phones improve with time.

With a dumbphone, the phone is at its best on day one. With an updatable smartphone, it's at its worst on day one.

The problem is, it's not clear just what the Lumia 900's future really is. This is a problem with two causes: AT&T and Microsoft.
__________________
N9: Go white or go home
 
Guest | Posts: n/a | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on
#669
Originally Posted by daperl View Post
There's nothing better than a ringing endorsement from ars technica.

The Nokia Lumia 900: A good phone at a great price that you probably shouldn't buy



Who wrote that article? My 9 year old writes better than that. There are many positive articles on Lumia 900 and you choose this illiterate piece.
 
ibrakalifa's Avatar
Posts: 1,583 | Thanked: 1,203 times | Joined on Dec 2011 @ Everywhere
#670
lumiaman is m$ volunteer, loooooool

poor man
__________________
~$
~#
 
Reply

Tags
blame others, deluded fanboys, kidsbeingkids, lumiadork, ms will die, salesdroids, the elop flop, wp blows


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:25.