|
2013-05-25
, 12:46
|
Posts: 59 |
Thanked: 46 times |
Joined on Jul 2011
@ London
|
#62
|
|
2013-05-25
, 13:54
|
|
Posts: 1,390 |
Thanked: 710 times |
Joined on May 2012
@ Beirut, Lebanon
|
#63
|
I will vote AMD for president next time if I'm having any shares during next meeting.
|
2013-05-25
, 14:18
|
Posts: 3,464 |
Thanked: 5,107 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Gothenburg in Sweden
|
#64
|
Yes. Like I said in post #42 , it must support USB 3.
This opens up many possibilities and the vendors does not have to do a lot to come up with solutions. Vendor can design docking station OH with a USB hub and a bunch of ports to support what ever devices.
The interface must be clean and unique. I am not sure if they should go with standard USB interface. Apple always wins with a non-standard interface. I hate that but this is a special situation and the cover has to hold on to the body without making it too bulky. So there maybe a reason for a custom interface that makes it clean, unique and cool.
|
2013-05-25
, 14:31
|
Posts: 1,225 |
Thanked: 1,905 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
@ Quezon City, Philippines
|
#65
|
|
2013-05-25
, 14:42
|
Posts: 3,464 |
Thanked: 5,107 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Gothenburg in Sweden
|
#66
|
Here.
Note: The Exynos 5 (see: SGS4 International) supports USB 3.0 speeds, however, it is omitted from the phones because the MLC/TLC eMMC chips can't even try to get close to that.
|
2013-05-25
, 14:46
|
|
Posts: 7,075 |
Thanked: 9,073 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Moon! It's not the East or the West side... it's the Dark Side
|
#67
|
And what do you think the price is for so new SoC in small volumes? :O
I Say again its to unrealistic beleive Jolla will have so new SoC also Jolla has stated its a midrange device.
|
2013-05-25
, 14:46
|
Posts: 752 |
Thanked: 2,808 times |
Joined on Jan 2011
@ Czech Republic
|
#68
|
|
2013-05-25
, 15:08
|
Posts: 1,225 |
Thanked: 1,905 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
@ Quezon City, Philippines
|
#69
|
And what do you think the price is for so new SoC in small volumes? :O
I Say again its to unrealistic beleive Jolla will have so new SoC also Jolla has stated its a midrange device.
|
2013-05-25
, 15:48
|
Posts: 3,464 |
Thanked: 5,107 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Gothenburg in Sweden
|
#70
|
$25 for a single chip, tops.
A single Exynos 5 ARM PC is $250, including lots of daughterboards and connectivity components.
As it is right now, it seems that Jolla will be using some derivation of the ST-Ericsson NovaThor SoCs for the Jolla.
If they're using those chips, I highly doubt they'd be able to complete another platform in ~6 months - what they have now is likely being refined to make a solid phone.
Which leaves the question: Will Jolla make a phone purely for the masturbation of the enthusiast users, or will they take advantage of the (yet to be detailed) Other Half?
The Following User Says Thank You to mikecomputing For This Useful Post: | ||
Tags |
half-assed?, irfmtransceiver, jolla, the other half, voting for nemo |
|
(It's also incredibly hacker-friendly, only requiring someone cut and strip a USB cable and some electrical tape)
I guess a second row of 5 pins that go straight to the charging hardware would work too, allowing OH functions to continue working while charging on a dock/wirelessly, and at the same time double the device's expansion ports.
Now only if Jolla would add some PHYs for us
N9 PR 1.3 Open Mode + kernel-plus for Harmattan
@kenweknot, working on Glacier for Nemo.