Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 1,400 | Thanked: 3,751 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ Arctic cold of northern .fi
#61
Or this third option that might actually be the right one:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I%C2%B2C
 
Posts: 92 | Thanked: 238 times | Joined on Jun 2011 @ Finland
#62
Originally Posted by willi6868 View Post
What other types of services besides scoring and model building does L2C provide?

Data Processing
Data Aggregation
Merge/purge
Suppressions
Database optimization.

source: http://www.l2cinc.com/faqs.html

Edit: : Lol what is this L2C? Don't know if the linked site is correct..
I think that it is I2C, not L2C:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I2c
 
Community Council | Posts: 4,920 | Thanked: 12,867 times | Joined on May 2012 @ Southerrn Finland
#63
It is actually i2c
 
willi6868's Avatar
Posts: 548 | Thanked: 562 times | Joined on Aug 2011 @ Germany
#64
Originally Posted by juiceme View Post
It is actually i2c
Ah I see.. sorry

Seems to be some smart technique anyways
 
Posts: 835 | Thanked: 772 times | Joined on Oct 2007 @ Finland
#65
I wonder which SoC is it going to be, is it Snapdragon 200, 400, S4 Plus or S4 Pro. They could have listed it as 960x540 at the beginning to avoid confusion, qHD does not equal to HD. Oh well, at least I know for sure that I can try one out at DNA store when it arrives.
 
Posts: 735 | Thanked: 1,054 times | Joined on Jun 2010
#66
lol, so when they said "HD" what they really meant was one quarter of HD, but that's okay because qHD still has the letters "H" and "D" in the title!
 
Morpog's Avatar
Posts: 956 | Thanked: 2,628 times | Joined on Nov 2011
#67
Well, Apple called it Retina Display and everybody loved it.
qHD is the correct technical term.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Morpog For This Useful Post:
Posts: 735 | Thanked: 1,054 times | Joined on Jun 2010
#68
jolla called it "HD" and left the audience that it meant one of the two commonly understood HD resolutions:

HD (1280x720)
Full HD (1920x1080)

it should also be noted the original retina display was on a 3.5" screen.

Last edited by Jedibeeftrix; 2013-09-19 at 13:18.
 
OVK's Avatar
Posts: 559 | Thanked: 1,017 times | Joined on May 2008 @ Finland
#69
I am interested if the screen is LCD or AMOLED. Just to now if LPM screen is possible.
__________________
Hattivattein lauma sankka suur!
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to OVK For This Useful Post:
Posts: 496 | Thanked: 651 times | Joined on Jan 2010 @ London
#70
Originally Posted by Morpog View Post
Well, Apple called it Retina Display and everybody loved it.
The original Retina Display was actually 960x640 (linked to the fact tha Apple did not favour the 16:9 aspect ratio) on a 3.5" screen. That gives it a dramatically higher ppi of 326 when compared to the Jolla's approx 245 ppi - which is less than that of the N900 or the N9.

Given the claims that the display was going to HD of some sort, this is a little disappointing.
 

The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to strongm For This Useful Post:
Reply

Tags
device, jolla, jolla phone, pre-order


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 22:32.