|
2008-05-21
, 03:36
|
Posts: 110 |
Thanked: 9 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
|
#62
|
|
2008-05-21
, 03:44
|
|
Posts: 1,245 |
Thanked: 421 times |
Joined on Dec 2005
|
#63
|
My take on this (obviously not the consensus) is that the maemo os development community is too transient to force into a traditional debian/ubuntu maintainer structure.
A large portion of Maemo software is pretty much homebrew and ports. Forcing Maemo.org actually damages the homebrew aspect of it... mostly since its a broken website (akamai + midguard cms apparently do not mix). Perhaps ITT software could better enable this homebrew aspect.
Additionally (and probably unpopularly) i think relying -solely- on repos hurts tablets. I think whenever possible, tablet developers should make some attempt to release a version which statically links any necessary libraries so that there is no dependency hell. This is done for desktop users with thumbdrives such as those here http://portableapps.com/
I vote that Reggie starts up his own repo, and provide a simple and logical means to publish to it, instead of the beaurocracy that is submitting to maemo extras. (Honestly do we really need a sign our packages for a tablet which ships with 256meg filesystem?) One reggie repo would be better than 10 or so independent repos, would it not? Of course that implies alot of potential bandwidth which may not be wanted.
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to gnuite For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2008-05-21
, 03:52
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#64
|
|
2008-05-21
, 03:55
|
Posts: 161 |
Thanked: 75 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
|
#65
|
|
2008-05-21
, 04:02
|
|
Posts: 1,245 |
Thanked: 421 times |
Joined on Dec 2005
|
#66
|
Why didn't Reggie bother to talk this out with the community and the Maemo devs to come up with the best solution? Instead of getting something useful out of it that helps everybody, we've got this nonsense.
GTFO, KTHXBAI
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to gnuite For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2008-05-21
, 04:15
|
|
Posts: 1,436 |
Thanked: 3,144 times |
Joined on Jul 2005
|
#67
|
|
2008-05-21
, 04:58
|
Posts: 161 |
Thanked: 75 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
|
#68
|
Is there a "No thanks" button on these forums?
[...]yours is a completely non-constructive attitude to take. Reggie was just trying to help. Some of the rest of us are just providing some constructive (I hope) criticism[...]
|
2008-05-21
, 05:10
|
|
Posts: 5,478 |
Thanked: 5,222 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ St. Petersburg, FL
|
#69
|
Reggie, in my *personal* opinion you are pointing to the right direction with the wrong munition.
...
Anyway, the maemo.org and ITT communities can figure out the details but it is clear that nobody is interested in harming the neighbor project , stress the already busy developers and confuse the probably already disoriented end users.
I'm sorry, but I still take the other tack-- I see this as an educational challenge more than anything. I was half-joking with the suggestion of a developer school, but in all seriousness that's close to the solution zone I think we *should* be going toward.
The community is transient? Fine-- but instead of working around that, why not drill down a bit deeper and explore why that is-- and effect a REAL solution?
And, dammit-- why am I still arguing this?
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net