davbost
|
2010-02-21
, 06:46
|
|
Posts: 90 |
Thanked: 22 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ North Carolina, USA
|
#61
|
|
2010-02-21
, 06:51
|
Posts: 307 |
Thanked: 157 times |
Joined on Jul 2009
@ Illinois, USA
|
#62
|
Next question is for yourself:
Do you trust that the community is capable of producing a production quality MeeGo or Maemo 6 for N900, if it had technical assistance by Nokia for driver issues? And would you use it?
|
2010-02-21
, 06:51
|
Posts: 11 |
Thanked: 5 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#63
|
I bought in because it was exactly the phone I was looking for: more computer than phone. And I've been quite happy with it, even with its flaws. Even if Nokia ended support for it tomorrow, I'd be fine with it. I know some of you out there with 770s, 800s and 810s aren't treating those like bricks. They still have use for those who own them.
|
2010-02-21
, 07:14
|
|
Posts: 5,478 |
Thanked: 5,222 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ St. Petersburg, FL
|
#64
|
I have to say no, I don't believe this. Sure free software gets developed and some of it is ok or even good. Its a fact of history though, that if organizaiton A develops software with no expectation of money and organization B develops the software with a business model in mind, company B will always develop better software.
|
2010-02-21
, 07:15
|
|
Posts: 579 |
Thanked: 286 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Australia
|
#65
|
First off, let me make a statement: The prospect that Hartmann might not be supported by Nokia on the N900 is something that was well known to the community before. That situation has not changed with the MeeGo announcement. Yet, many of us bought in despite that potential cloud over our heads. The question is, what were those reasons, and what has changed now to make you want to jump ship?
I bought in because it was exactly the phone I was looking for: more computer than phone. And I've been quite happy with it, even with its flaws. Even if Nokia ended support for it tomorrow, I'd be fine with it. I know some of you out there with 770s, 800s and 810s aren't treating those like bricks. They still have use for those who own them.
I'm more reassured by the QT support that will happen with both OSs, because it means that applications can cross-pollinate at the very least.
The Following User Says Thank You to felbutss For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-02-21
, 08:22
|
|
Posts: 455 |
Thanked: 782 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Netherlands
|
#66
|
Its a fact of history though, that if organizaiton A develops software with no expectation of money and organization B develops the software with a business model in mind, company B will always develop better software.
The Following User Says Thank You to zwer For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-02-21
, 08:53
|
Posts: 11 |
Thanked: 5 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#67
|
|
2010-02-21
, 08:59
|
Posts: 39 |
Thanked: 7 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Stockholm
|
#68
|
The Following User Says Thank You to illemann For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-02-21
, 09:15
|
Posts: 31 |
Thanked: 5 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Poland
|
#69
|
|
2010-02-21
, 09:34
|
|
Posts: 579 |
Thanked: 286 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Australia
|
#70
|
That's the core of problem here. Nokia advertised N900 as real breakthrough in mobile devices and once they got some revenue out of it, they said something like "oops, Maemo 5 and N900 was mistake. From now on we will do it better, with Intel.. Sorry, N900 users..."
Where am I wrong at that thinking?
Tags |
be happy, be worry, don't worry, reading is a skill, stskeeps rats, too long?, you're the problem |
|