|
2010-07-03
, 15:53
|
Posts: 724 |
Thanked: 1,255 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
@ Cambridge, UK
|
#62
|
Forgive me for quoting the person I quoted, my statement isn't directed to that person at all; however it's a general inquiry where I'm either overlooking something or totally oblivious to something. Neither is new to me.
However... if the community can make Maemo, any iteration of it, as polished as they wish it to be; why is it not as polished as some members would want it to truly be? The problems are very minor, you can overclock it for a better experience, change the transitions... but those aren't really polishing as much as helping the platform along.
To me, polishing would be... well, eradicating the existing bugs that are hampered with WONTFIX tags. Hit Bugzilla if you're missing my point on that. Or... totally changing the UI, to make it leaner or more versatile - the recent ApMeFo is a great example of this in motion. But those level of apps are far and few in-between. And the bits that really need polishing - incoming phone call, look at in portrait and that delay for instance - will more than likely never happen because that bit is closed.
So how can this community really polish Maemo 5 when the parts that need it the most - besides Modest - are really closed?
|
2010-07-03
, 16:06
|
|
Posts: 267 |
Thanked: 408 times |
Joined on May 2010
@ Austria
|
#63
|
How or what Nokia market it as is irrelevant. When they launched the N93 (or was it the N95?) their marketing nonsense was something like "It's what the computer has become".
What is relevant here is whether they have put in love and passion to make it a polished product. Where features are complete and work as advertised and there are no nasty surprises.
But the fact is that all Nokia's phones for the past 5 years at least are works in progress and most are never finished and are abandoned in favour of the next new phone.
This is more of a UI issue. It's obvious the people who made maps for the N900 didn't read the maemo UI guidelines.
Exactly. The average user is used to the "fullscreen" button having an arrow pointing in a NW direction. Along comes maps and decides that having the arrow pointing SE would be a good idea, and having it pointing NW would toggle it back to non-fullscreen mode.
|
2010-07-03
, 16:14
|
Posts: 670 |
Thanked: 747 times |
Joined on Aug 2009
@ Kansas City, Missouri, USA
|
#64
|
The simple answer is that Nokia programmers suck. Plus they have no idea of usability.
...what about the ability to select more than 1 app at a time to install/uninstall? After all it can already update multiples apps in one go.
|
2010-07-03
, 16:19
|
|
Posts: 267 |
Thanked: 408 times |
Joined on May 2010
@ Austria
|
#65
|
This is something I completely agree with, the core UX needs to be FOSS IMO. I'm not talking about the stupid little sketch application, or any of the actual "Applications". I mean the dial UI basically the system functions should be FOSS.
On the other hand, we can rewrite callui and drop it in pretty easily.
PS. At least I believe it to not be _too_ difficult
|
2010-07-03
, 16:31
|
Posts: 63 |
Thanked: 11 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ greece
|
#66
|
|
2010-07-03
, 16:32
|
Posts: 474 |
Thanked: 283 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Oxford, UK
|
#67
|
|
2010-07-03
, 16:38
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#68
|
A "polished" N900 wouldn't have those behaviours, and if such a behaviour slipped in, it would be treated as a bug and fixed *quickly* because that's what polish is all about: attention to detail, caring about those details, getting it just right so it's a pleasure to use.
The Following User Says Thank You to For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-07-03
, 18:01
|
Posts: 61 |
Thanked: 23 times |
Joined on May 2010
@ Dallas, Texas
|
#69
|
|
2010-07-03
, 18:22
|
|
Posts: 52 |
Thanked: 15 times |
Joined on Jul 2010
|
#70
|
Tags |
just more, verbal diarrhea |
|
I have a theory that Nokia employees don't use Nokia phones- most probably use iphones , that's why glaring deficiencies never get fixed.