|
2011-01-22
, 17:43
|
|
Posts: 255 |
Thanked: 160 times |
Joined on Oct 2010
@ Finland
|
#62
|
Very true. I'm just trying to point out, when moving between hardware platforms, there are far more important issues to consider than whether you need to recompile your code or not.
|
2011-01-22
, 17:45
|
Posts: 3,319 |
Thanked: 5,610 times |
Joined on Aug 2008
@ Finland
|
#63
|
Fair enough. But what about the apps? And I'm really dying to listen some official comments from Nokia's on this...
The Following User Says Thank You to attila77 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-01-22
, 18:02
|
Posts: 376 |
Thanked: 511 times |
Joined on Aug 2009
@ Greece
|
#64
|
VM is an advantage in only corner cases - like if the developer has abandoned his project and never bothered to resubmit with a newer SDK (note that you don't even need another target - the Qt SDK already shields you from architectural differences - you're ifdeffing Symbian/MeeGo and NOT X86/ARM/MIPS !). In that case, the question is if you really want an application in your store for which you know there will not be any updates, security, performance or other ? So even there the VM advantage is a foggy forward-compatibility promise at best...
The Following User Says Thank You to v13 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-01-22
, 18:12
|
|
Posts: 1,366 |
Thanked: 1,185 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
|
#65
|
|
2011-01-22
, 18:15
|
Posts: 282 |
Thanked: 337 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Austin, TX, USA
|
#66
|
The main limiting factor is the size, not the power.
Expect to see continued development of iPhone & android (& WP7) like UI, until head mounted displays are the norms.
|
2011-01-22
, 18:16
|
Posts: 3,319 |
Thanked: 5,610 times |
Joined on Aug 2008
@ Finland
|
#67
|
And of course if you really are concerned about portability across architectures the QtWeb Runtime is available.
The Following User Says Thank You to attila77 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-01-22
, 18:24
|
|
Posts: 4,384 |
Thanked: 5,524 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ ˙ǝɹǝɥʍou
|
#68
|
Quite the contrary. Live homescreen widgets are already available on Maemo and Symbian, and will doubtless be available on meego platforms. On the N900 I have one glance at live widgets for music player, email, facebook, and conversations. These are not just blinking indicators, but full apps that I can interact with and control. Can you imagine NOT having those on a tablet sized device...iPad and Galaxy Tab have huge screens and still don't support this basic multitasking.
|
2011-01-22
, 18:38
|
Posts: 2,829 |
Thanked: 1,459 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Finland
|
#69
|
I thought live homescreen widgets have always already been on Android since 1.0. I'm baffled why Apple hasn't added this yet, especially on iPad's launch.
|
2011-01-22
, 19:06
|
Posts: 724 |
Thanked: 1,255 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
@ Cambridge, UK
|
#70
|
For same reason why there has been numerous of people here telling weird problems that mostly end up beign misbehaving widgets. And what I have understood from maemo bugzilla bug comments on issues with hildon-home the Nokians are not too happy with people who code bad widgets. Widgets tend to drain battery and if they have memory leaks they might end up making phone very unstable. Additionally IIRC they said that running python based apps constanlty on background is really bad idea.
Tags |
bada rox, dalvik, future, java haters, meego, meego?fail, nokia, sandbox sucks |
|
Expect to see continued development of iPhone & android (& WP7) like UI, until head mounted displays are the norms.
Class .. : Power User
Humor .. : [#####-----] | Alignment: Pragmatist
Patience : [###-------] | Weapon(s): Galaxy Note + BB Bold Touch 9900
Agro ... : [###-------] | Relic(s) : iPhone 4S, Atrix, Milestone, N900, N800, N95, HTC G1, Treos, Zauri, BB 9000, BB 9700, etc