Active Topics
stlpaul |
2011-03-29
, 20:24
|
|
Posts: 1,141 |
Thanked: 781 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Magical Unicorn Land
|
#61
|
Well I hope the N950 is every-band LTE then for USians
|
|
2011-03-29
, 21:02
|
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#62
|
I never quite understood why Nokia produced only a T-Mobile compatible version and didn't make a version that worked with the much larger AT&T.
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to For This Useful Post: | ||
 |
|
2011-03-29
, 21:09
|
|
Posts: 4,672 |
Thanked: 5,455 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Springfield, MA, USA
|
#63
|
Originally Posted by gerbick
Because they're Nokia. They'll defensively claim it's cultural and it's just their way. You know--the USA should be more like Europe and have less diverse technologies.
I never quite understood why Nokia produced only a T-Mobile compatible version and didn't make a version that worked with the much larger AT&T.
I love the irony--covering their inadequacies in culture and arrogance and then claim you're the arrogant culture.
__________________
Nokia's slogan shouldn't be the pedo-palmgrabbing image with the slogan, "Connecting People"... It should be one hand open pleadingly with another hand giving the middle finger and the more apt slogan, "Potential Unrealized." --DR
Nokia's slogan shouldn't be the pedo-palmgrabbing image with the slogan, "Connecting People"... It should be one hand open pleadingly with another hand giving the middle finger and the more apt slogan, "Potential Unrealized." --DR
|
|
2011-03-29
, 22:00
|
|
Posts: 701 |
Thanked: 585 times |
Joined on Sep 2010
@ London, England
|
#64
|
Originally Posted by gerbick
Because the USA isn't the only country in the world, presumably the frequencies they chose to support are usable in more of the world than what AT&T uses for 3G.
I never quite understood why Nokia produced only a T-Mobile compatible version and didn't make a version that worked with the much larger AT&T.
Maybe Nokia should have made versions that support other frequencies, but since they did only one version when you look at what they chose you have to consider the global picture.
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to retsaw For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2011-03-29
, 22:11
|
|
Posts: 4,672 |
Thanked: 5,455 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Springfield, MA, USA
|
#65
|
Originally Posted by retsaw
Aaand we're back to what I kept saying they SHOULD have done: modular radio. That way, you can get a tablet with NO cell phone for a LOT cheaper, then either stick with wifi-only for cheap, or buy whatever radio you need for your region and/or use the port for other hacking. Tsk.
Because the USA isn't the only country in the world, presumably the frequencies they chose to support are usable in more of the world than what AT&T uses for 3G.
Maybe Nokia should have made versions that support other frequencies, but since they did only one version when you look at what they chose you have to consider the global picture.
__________________
Nokia's slogan shouldn't be the pedo-palmgrabbing image with the slogan, "Connecting People"... It should be one hand open pleadingly with another hand giving the middle finger and the more apt slogan, "Potential Unrealized." --DR
Nokia's slogan shouldn't be the pedo-palmgrabbing image with the slogan, "Connecting People"... It should be one hand open pleadingly with another hand giving the middle finger and the more apt slogan, "Potential Unrealized." --DR
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to danramos For This Useful Post: | ||
 |
|
2011-03-29
, 22:35
|
|
Posts: 80 |
Thanked: 37 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Long Island, New York
|
#66
|
Originally Posted by retsaw
actually AT&T uses more internationally standard frequencies. T-Mo is the GSM/GPRS frequency oddball....but they have greater service, quality and plans....and speed....
Because the USA isn't the only country in the world, presumably the frequencies they chose to support are usable in more of the world than what AT&T uses for 3G.
Maybe Nokia should have made versions that support other frequencies, but since they did only one version when you look at what they chose you have to consider the global picture.
__________________
Sean aka Mr. Swimmtastic
Long Island/NYC Resident Nokia S60/Maemo Lover
Lover of Music, Technology & Travel
If I'm not logged in, I'm probably jetsetting to a city near you...
Sean aka Mr. Swimmtastic
Long Island/NYC Resident Nokia S60/Maemo Lover
Lover of Music, Technology & Travel
If I'm not logged in, I'm probably jetsetting to a city near you...
| The Following User Says Thank You to Swimm12984 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2011-03-29
, 23:13
|
|
Posts: 701 |
Thanked: 585 times |
Joined on Sep 2010
@ London, England
|
#67
|
Originally Posted by Swimm12984
Really? Note the region section for the 1900MHz band AT&T uses.
actually AT&T uses more internationally standard frequencies. T-Mo is the GSM/GPRS frequency oddball....but they have greater service, quality and plans....and speed....
| The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to retsaw For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2011-03-30
, 14:17
|
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#68
|
Originally Posted by retsaw
No **** Sherlock. I mean, there are other countries other than AMURIKA!? No WAY!
Because the USA isn't the only country in the world, presumably the frequencies they chose to support are usable in more of the world than what AT&T uses for 3G.
Seriously dude, the anti-American sentiment laced through these forums is rather tiresome. I've lived overseas almost as long as I've lived in the US.
But since you wanted to state what you had stated, I'll allow myself to go deeper.
Only Nokia, in their total lack of understanding of the North American market, one they've largely ignored yet somehow it's become important to the shareholders, the same shareholders that brought in Elop, decide to go with the 4th largest carrier in the US. What a way to: 1) be a bunch of cheap bastards that can't afford to place a different GSM radio into a phone that will only work in about 70% of the US and 2) show how little they know about the US market by going with a company that eventually got swallowed up my the larger GSM carrier.
Simply stated, that's yet another short-sighted decision by Nokia in a string of short-sighted decisions that have undermined Maemo, MeeGo and ultimately Nokia.
Keep showing faith in Nokia. They apparently are really able to make really good decisions based on long-term prospects.
Just like Elop and their current stock pricing. Wise folks indeed.
Maybe Nokia should have made versions that support other frequencies, but since they did only one version when you look at what they chose you have to consider the global picture.
Nokia. Best damn decision makers since the guy that overlooked Elvis.
|
|
2011-03-30
, 14:27
|
|
Posts: 4,672 |
Thanked: 5,455 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Springfield, MA, USA
|
#69
|
Once again..if they only had ONE device to make.. why not make that ONE device with an internal USB or at LEAST a slot or port of SOME sort (I hear PCIe is becoming popular slot on some mobile devices) in that ONE device so that that ONE device isn't hobbled to only ONE set of regions and/or network and/or era in time? What with 4G starting to roll out fast, it would have been the smart move. You know--something that indisputably makes your ONE product better than everyone else's--not just arguably.
NOKIA: Connecting People? Heheheh
NOKIA: Connecting People? Heheheh
__________________
Nokia's slogan shouldn't be the pedo-palmgrabbing image with the slogan, "Connecting People"... It should be one hand open pleadingly with another hand giving the middle finger and the more apt slogan, "Potential Unrealized." --DR
Nokia's slogan shouldn't be the pedo-palmgrabbing image with the slogan, "Connecting People"... It should be one hand open pleadingly with another hand giving the middle finger and the more apt slogan, "Potential Unrealized." --DR
| The Following User Says Thank You to danramos For This Useful Post: | ||
