|
2011-06-21
, 13:58
|
|
Posts: 1,309 |
Thanked: 1,187 times |
Joined on Nov 2008
|
#7132
|
The Following User Says Thank You to volt For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-06-21
, 14:00
|
|
Posts: 190 |
Thanked: 167 times |
Joined on Aug 2009
@ Brazil
|
#7133
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Verythrax For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-06-21
, 14:00
|
Posts: 347 |
Thanked: 441 times |
Joined on Dec 2010
|
#7134
|
The things that I really loved in the N900 like flash support, FM transmitter, swappable batteries, are all gone. Improvements from the N900? CPU - debatable since we don't know what the N9/N950 will clock to vs the N900 typically running stable at 1.1GHz. Voice navigation - this was promised to N900 users way back from what I can remember, but it never materialized.
Sure, there's other nifty things like NFC that are on the N9, but as far as I'm concerned they're all nifty little things that are nice to have but I'd be perfectly fine living without.
Based on the information available so far on the N9/N950, IMHO the N9/N950 is a very "almost there" phone at best - which I find really disappointing. I was really looking forward to the N9/N950 to replace my aging N900. At this exact moment in time, I'm 50/50 in deciding whether to get another N900 as a backup to last me another few years. The N9, while being a step forward in some areas, is definitely (for me) a step backwards in just as many, and stagnation in the rest.
|
2011-06-21
, 14:00
|
|
Posts: 490 |
Thanked: 296 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Hannover-Germany-EU-Earth
|
#7135
|
|
2011-06-21
, 14:01
|
Posts: 34 |
Thanked: 9 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#7136
|
Source for this? Not that I doubt you; just this is the first time I've honestly heard this.
The Following User Says Thank You to zonk0r For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-06-21
, 14:01
|
|
Posts: 1,309 |
Thanked: 1,187 times |
Joined on Nov 2008
|
#7137
|
|
2011-06-21
, 14:01
|
Posts: 242 |
Thanked: 269 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
|
#7138
|
i know the UK market is absurd, but I live here and would rather spend my money in the UK than the US. Although a massive chunk of the money i spend on these products will go abroad, at least some stays in the UK.
Based on UK prices therefore - I can't see this phone costing £700, even for the 64GB version.
Am I right in thinking this OMAP version is the one that the Sammy Hummingbird CPU was based on? I would not be suprised - especially given nokia are sammy's biggest chip customer.
The memory modules will be the thing that'll push the price up, mainly because 70% (ballpark figure) of all of these modules were produced by Toshiba, who had to close their two main plants down in Japan because of the Tsunami.
With the price of AMOLED screens about the plummet with that HUGGGEEEE fab plant coming online in the next month or two as well, I can't see any reason for the price of this phone to be high - apart from the memory, and maybe ramp it up because of development costs - but I can't see them punishing the customer with that on a first-release device anyways?
|
2011-06-21
, 14:03
|
|
Posts: 190 |
Thanked: 167 times |
Joined on Aug 2009
@ Brazil
|
#7139
|
|
2011-06-21
, 14:03
|
Posts: 434 |
Thanked: 245 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#7140
|
Tags |
duke nukem4eva, epic!, harmattan, n-950, nokia diamond, non-believers, rm680, wasteland |
|
Sure, there's other nifty things like NFC that are on the N9, but as far as I'm concerned they're all nifty little things that are nice to have but I'd be perfectly fine living without.
Based on the information available so far on the N9/N950, IMHO the N9/N950 is a very "almost there" phone at best - which I find really disappointing. I was really looking forward to the N9/N950 to replace my aging N900. At this exact moment in time, I'm 50/50 in deciding whether to get another N900 as a backup to last me another few years. The N9, while being a step forward in some areas, is definitely (for me) a step backwards in just as many, and stagnation in the rest.