|
2012-07-17
, 16:12
|
Posts: 234 |
Thanked: 160 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
|
#752
|
Your vision looks very nice. But if you read the press releases by Jolla, there is nothing of your vision there. They are going to make a phone for the masses running a closed ecosystem.
|
2012-07-17
, 16:55
|
Posts: 1,298 |
Thanked: 2,277 times |
Joined on May 2011
|
#753
|
|
2012-07-17
, 17:18
|
Posts: 322 |
Thanked: 218 times |
Joined on Feb 2012
|
#754
|
And you need to look beyond just what Jolla is doing. For a project like Mer to be successful, they are going to need some corporate buy-in by someone at some point. If Jolla succeeds at what they are doing, it is going to benefit your desire for more open mobile OSs, because it benefits Mer.
That being said, how open or closed Jolla is going to be is still an open question. There are a lot of details that we just don't know right now. That being said, given the DNA of what Jolla is basing their work on, it is likely to be more open than any other mobile OS out there.
But, as long as we are talking about cell phones, the OSs are going to need to have the ability to be closed to a certain extent because that's what the carriers want. Doesn't mean we can't get around that limitation.
|
2012-07-17
, 17:19
|
Posts: 3,464 |
Thanked: 5,107 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Gothenburg in Sweden
|
#755
|
I think that the main difference is, that the x86 architecture maintains binary compatibility and ARM doesn't.
Eq. a binary for an Acorn computer won't run on a cortex A8, but a Lotus Notes binary for a 286 should theoretically run on modern Core i7 just fine.
As a result, ARM can discard outdated parts of the instructions set when creating a new ARM based architecture (ARMv1,ARMv2,ARMv3,...) and x86 can't.
|
2012-07-17
, 17:23
|
Posts: 3,464 |
Thanked: 5,107 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Gothenburg in Sweden
|
#756
|
That is the main problem. Jolla is no alternative. It is just yet another closed system. This means they are competing head to head with every other closed system, Android, iOS, WP, RIM.
This also means that I have to make a choice for ecosystem. Whatever, what I want is an alternative to the closed systems, an open system with real HW. What I don't want is "potential", I am fed up with "potential". So far Jolla has shown nothing of what I want, and a tiny bit of what I don't want (potential).
In that light, the 808 looks kind of cool. No potential, lots of HW, what you get is what you get. The SGS3 also looks kind of cool. And a pureview Lumia WP8 also seems cool.
|
2012-07-17
, 17:31
|
|
Posts: 7,075 |
Thanked: 9,073 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Moon! It's not the East or the West side... it's the Dark Side
|
#757
|
|
2012-07-17
, 17:39
|
Posts: 234 |
Thanked: 160 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
|
#758
|
This doesn't make sense to me. In what way, shape or form can this be more open than Android? Android kernels are open, this doesn't make Samsung's TouchViz open any more than it makes Nokias Swipe open. Still Android itself is open, much more so than Harmattan. When the ecosystem is closed, everything is closed from a user perspective. You use the device to access the ecosystem, that is the basic working principle of a smartphone.
|
2012-07-17
, 17:42
|
Posts: 322 |
Thanked: 218 times |
Joined on Feb 2012
|
#759
|
|
2012-07-17
, 17:44
|
|
Posts: 1,055 |
Thanked: 4,107 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Norway
|
#760
|
How long will the backer be willing to wait until they see a return on their investment?
Whoever is backing this is putting a lot on the line with a pretty high probability of failure.
Tags |
jolla, jolla on topic, jollamobile, meego, merproject, nokia, nokian9, professionals, speculations, tizenjolla |
|
It is clear that the smartphone market needs more options, otherwise there wouldn't be so much going on.
Ultimately, I agree with some of you around here who believe that a mobile phone should eventually be just a small computer, and you should be able to load up whichever OS you want relatively easily.
People talk about ecosystem, I like it when most of the things run on a browser - there aren't many excuses nowadays unless you want integration with hardware parts that aren't accessible from an ECMA script compatible API (read: JavaScript). I mean, seriously, I have 2 "apps" in my iPhone to do online check in, which connec to the internet and open their own browser. Seriously? Why? I can do the same thing with the N9, except faster.
All in all, I'm happy I won't have "just Android" to go for in a couple of years when my N9 dies of old age (or of too many falls I should say).
All the best to Jolla for being yet another alternative.
PS: I am, however, concerned about the hardware... my Nokia is still far superior than other devices I compare it with on a day to day basis, so hopefully that "stays" like Elop would put it.