|
2008-07-09
, 19:08
|
Posts: 5,335 |
Thanked: 8,187 times |
Joined on Mar 2007
@ Pennsylvania, USA
|
#782
|
...it'll be about double the performance with the same power consumption
The Following User Says Thank You to sjgadsby For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2008-07-09
, 19:18
|
Posts: 269 |
Thanked: 4 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Finland
|
#783
|
|
2008-07-09
, 19:23
|
|
Posts: 5,478 |
Thanked: 5,222 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ St. Petersburg, FL
|
#784
|
|
2008-07-09
, 19:31
|
Posts: 269 |
Thanked: 4 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Finland
|
#785
|
Uh, that is serious. OMAP3 offers about 2-3x the performance at the same battery consumption levels as OMAP2.
If you really want to read about all the neat features of OMAP3, I've covered it at least a half-dozen times in this thread (likely much more than that).
Here's a good start.
|
2008-07-11
, 13:20
|
|
Posts: 71 |
Thanked: 6 times |
Joined on Jun 2008
@ Lee's Summit, MO, USA
|
#786
|
|
2008-07-11
, 13:25
|
|
Posts: 276 |
Thanked: 160 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ Bath, UK
|
#787
|
More flash, more CPU power (die shrink), 3d acceleration and higher resolution, none of this mini-SD crap (obsolete the day it hit shelves, SIM support (optional), screen flush with faceplate, normal mini-USB, WiMax/Wireless-N, better GPS, Better camera, thinner profile, better placement of power and lock slider keys, stripped down compiz-fusion if I can dream.
|
2008-07-11
, 17:32
|
Posts: 83 |
Thanked: 18 times |
Joined on Jun 2008
|
#788
|
The Following User Says Thank You to wartstew For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2008-07-12
, 00:47
|
|
Posts: 71 |
Thanked: 6 times |
Joined on Jun 2008
@ Lee's Summit, MO, USA
|
#789
|
|
2008-07-12
, 00:52
|
|
Posts: 5,478 |
Thanked: 5,222 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ St. Petersburg, FL
|
#790
|
3) A boost in overall processor speed. Although I'm not sure how that will play out. It seems like 2D/3D video effects will be better, perhaps some other DSP functions as well. I'm not sure what the core "ARM" processor will be like other than its advertised "up to 3x improvement over an ARM11" claim.
4) A decrease in power consumption, but by an unknown amount. Going from a 90nm to a 64nm die size is suppose to decrease power consumption while increasing speed capability, but as Intel found out a few years back, this doesn't always yield the results you hoped for. Then there is no guarantee that Nokia then just put in a smaller battery.
Tags |
dpads are fun, ideas, n900, n900 wishlist, revenge of the styli, stuff for nokia to read, the wrath of sty, wishlist |
|
3xxx, 34xx,
Nice to hear... What do we get from this that were IMPOSSIBLE with current devices?