![]() |
2011-02-16
, 15:25
|
Posts: 1,101 |
Thanked: 1,184 times |
Joined on Aug 2008
@ Spain
|
#71
|
![]() |
2011-02-16
, 16:11
|
Posts: 674 |
Thanked: 191 times |
Joined on Mar 2008
@ Buenos Aires, Argentina
|
#72
|
![]() |
2011-02-16
, 16:35
|
Posts: 1,101 |
Thanked: 1,184 times |
Joined on Aug 2008
@ Spain
|
#73
|
FWIW, I recall but can't find the relevant post that the 400/133 mode may be lower power consumption than 333/266 because the DSP does not idle where the ARM does. At one point, I had a 400/133 kernel loaded and don't recall a change in battery life, but that's just a general impression.
Actually, looking at this, I have an idea. The original op_dsp patch limits the op states to 0 and 1, while the Diablo kernel sets the op state to 1. If we allow more op states with the dsp active, we can get significant battery gains by choosing state 2, or even 3 if it works.
cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/stats/time_in_state; battery_status; sleep 900; cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/stats/time_in_state; battery_status
![]() |
2011-02-16
, 20:23
|
Posts: 1,101 |
Thanked: 1,184 times |
Joined on Aug 2008
@ Spain
|
#74
|
Lucky you. I have never had that bug until now. But I can live with it.
What about the other "problem"? I mean the "broken" Community SSU update.
Thanks.
The Following User Says Thank You to maacruz For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2011-02-16
, 20:26
|
Posts: 1,101 |
Thanked: 1,184 times |
Joined on Aug 2008
@ Spain
|
#75
|
![]() |
2011-02-16
, 20:45
|
Posts: 1,101 |
Thanked: 1,184 times |
Joined on Aug 2008
@ Spain
|
#76
|
![]() |
2011-02-16
, 21:09
|
Posts: 637 |
Thanked: 445 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Kaliningrad, Russia
|
#77
|
Yes, that is true: the applications that start automatically are in my Personal Launcher. But in my case this behavior started with the installation of this beta.
![]() |
2011-02-16
, 22:10
|
Posts: 875 |
Thanked: 918 times |
Joined on Sep 2010
|
#78
|
Yes, that is true: the applications that start automatically are in my Personal Launcher. But in my case this behavior started with the installation of this beta.
0 (400/165) -> 2.8 % (11.2%/hour)
1 (333/266) -> 2.4 % (9.6%/hour)
2 (266/177) -> 2.0 % (8.0%/hour)
3 (165/110) -> 1.6 % (5.6%/hour)
![]() |
2011-02-16
, 22:22
|
Posts: 1,101 |
Thanked: 1,184 times |
Joined on Aug 2008
@ Spain
|
#79
|
Could the gconf/dbus fixes have broken personal launcher? Maybe try reverting them back to old versions and see if problem goes away. Maybe compile a DT kernel without touchscreen patch and let them them test it with personal launcher.
Is it 400/133 or 400/165? The governor doesn't work when dsp is enabled, right? And changing op_dsp locks the frequency of both cpu and dsp?
![]() |
2011-02-16
, 22:42
|
Posts: 206 |
Thanked: 46 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
|
#80
|