The Following User Says Thank You to Dave999 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2012-10-11
, 22:09
|
|
Posts: 1,455 |
Thanked: 3,309 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Rochester, NY
|
#72
|
|
2012-10-11
, 22:12
|
Posts: 55 |
Thanked: 138 times |
Joined on Jul 2011
@ Bulgaria
|
#73
|
|
2012-10-12
, 08:23
|
Posts: 2,802 |
Thanked: 4,491 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
|
#74
|
Maybe it would be better to specify that the next candidate with more number of votes might be able to access to Board
if a majority of Board agrees.
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to lma For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2012-10-12
, 09:18
|
|
Posts: 5,028 |
Thanked: 8,613 times |
Joined on Mar 2011
|
#75
|
|
2012-10-12
, 12:18
|
Posts: 1,513 |
Thanked: 2,248 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ US
|
#76
|
Maybe, but what if the next candidate is not available, or there is no next candidate?
Another issue is that with a seat already vacant we have an even-numbered board so it's very easy for the board to not have a majority opinion. And with the first board being a 3-member one that's even more likely.
I think it's a complex issue with many different cases to consider, and at some point there has to be a fallback of "new election for the vacant position(s)".
|
2012-10-12
, 12:22
|
Posts: 1,513 |
Thanked: 2,248 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ US
|
#77
|
The Following User Says Thank You to SD69 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2012-10-12
, 12:25
|
Posts: 1,163 |
Thanked: 1,873 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
@ The Netherlands
|
#78
|
|
2012-10-12
, 12:41
|
Posts: 2,802 |
Thanked: 4,491 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
|
#79
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to lma For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2012-10-12
, 13:28
|
Posts: 1,513 |
Thanked: 2,248 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ US
|
#80
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to SD69 For This Useful Post: | ||
Tags |
best wishes, council, whats going on? |
|
Do something for the climate today! Anything!
I don't trust poeple without a Nokia n900...