|
2008-04-17
, 18:10
|
|
Moderator |
Posts: 7,109 |
Thanked: 8,820 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Vancouver, BC, Canada
|
#72
|
The Following User Says Thank You to qole For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2008-04-17
, 18:20
|
|
Posts: 4,930 |
Thanked: 2,272 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
|
#73
|
|
2008-04-17
, 18:26
|
|
Posts: 5,478 |
Thanked: 5,222 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ St. Petersburg, FL
|
#74
|
|
2008-04-17
, 19:00
|
|
Posts: 4,708 |
Thanked: 4,649 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Bulgaria
|
#75
|
|
2008-04-17
, 19:25
|
|
Moderator |
Posts: 7,109 |
Thanked: 8,820 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Vancouver, BC, Canada
|
#76
|
|
2008-04-18
, 05:27
|
Posts: 452 |
Thanked: 522 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
|
#77
|
While it is very good to say Fennec right now is THE fastest browser for ther NIT, that does not go to say that FENNEC is the BEST stable browset for the NIT today.
FENNEC is no where near complete - crashes out often on large sites (which MicroB handles), kinetic scrolling only works on lite sites and on heavy sites (moderately) there is no way to even scroll up or down since they removed the scrollbars.
Installation memory footprint seems to be pretty big (i doont know about MicroB since its baked in into the OS).
So lets not make such definitive statements here. In fact Fennec/Minefield is stil not a ready app in the true sense. I installed it and had to uninstakll it if I really want a usable browser on my NIT.
Right now it is MicroB, sadly with its shortcomings.
|
2008-04-22
, 22:42
|
Posts: 10 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on Feb 2008
|
#78
|
|
2008-04-23
, 06:03
|
Posts: 54 |
Thanked: 11 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
|
#80
|
I think it is pretty clear that improvements to Microb are coming as well. Again, it is valid to be excited about the fact that we can expect to have a faster web browsing experience going forward.