Active Topics

 


Poll: Is this on or off-topic?
Poll Options
Is this on or off-topic?

Reply
Thread Tools
solarion's Avatar
Posts: 117 | Thanked: 32 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ USA
#71
There. *Now* at least there's a value-add. And I got my votes in.
__________________
--
Umm, what?
 
Texrat's Avatar
Posts: 11,700 | Thanked: 10,045 times | Joined on Jun 2006 @ North Texas, USA
#72
I don't know how to answer the poll based on the ambiguous premise.
__________________
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net
 
solarion's Avatar
Posts: 117 | Thanked: 32 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ USA
#73
Oh, and providing more evidence for option 3, It should be "On-topic" and "Off-topic." Read the question as "Is this on-topic"?
__________________
--
Umm, what?
 
solarion's Avatar
Posts: 117 | Thanked: 32 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ USA
#74
Originally Posted by Texrat View Post
I don't know how to answer the poll based on the ambiguous premise.
I dunno about that; I think there's at least one clearly right answer there....
__________________
--
Umm, what?
 
solarion's Avatar
Posts: 117 | Thanked: 32 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ USA
#75
I think I even answered my own poll wrong. *sigh*

Time, I think, for additional caffeine resources.
__________________
--
Umm, what?
 
Posts: 336 | Thanked: 610 times | Joined on Apr 2008 @ France
#76
Originally Posted by Texrat View Post
Can a mod merge this with solarion's thread in General? It really isn't Off Topic, and I sooo want to thank some sensible posts...
Damn, didn't know we couldn't thank in this forum.

I've updated my previous post to include some more information.
 
solarion's Avatar
Posts: 117 | Thanked: 32 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ USA
#77
Originally Posted by Texrat View Post
Not desperation at all-- companies must defend their patents or risk losing the value of them.
I think you must either specify what you mean by "the value" (I'd argue that purely defensive patents are extremely valuable) or else you're confusing patents and trademarks.
__________________
--
Umm, what?
 
solarion's Avatar
Posts: 117 | Thanked: 32 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ USA
#78
Originally Posted by matthewcc View Post
IP is what makes any company worth something. Nokia needs to be sure that there has been a violation before you sue someone. I have to say it is quite ballsy to knowingly infringe on patents on your core devices.
No, products are what makes any company worth something. Without products, you're just a leech.
__________________
--
Umm, what?
 
SubCore's Avatar
Posts: 850 | Thanked: 626 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ Vienna, Austria
#79
Originally Posted by solarion View Post
No, products are what makes any company worth something.
and where do you believe products come from?
couldn't be the company's intellectual property by any chance, could it?

not to mention IP itself can be sold as a product... as in "licensing" something
 
Texrat's Avatar
Posts: 11,700 | Thanked: 10,045 times | Joined on Jun 2006 @ North Texas, USA
#80
Originally Posted by solarion View Post
I think you must either specify what you mean by "the value" (I'd argue that purely defensive patents are extremely valuable) or else you're confusing patents and trademarks.
I think you misunderstand. Go back to the later post where I included links; the second link references what I mean.

(oh, and I won't be confusing any IP protection mechanisms-- I'm well-versed in all of them )
__________________
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net
 
Reply

Tags
apple, intellectual property, lawsuit, nokia, nonsense magnet, patent infringement


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:54.