Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 144 | Thanked: 266 times | Joined on Nov 2009
#71
Here are BTW the resolutions of iPhone 3GS and N900:

- iPhone 3GS: = 480x320 = 153600 pixels
- N900: 800x480 = 384000 pixels

The iPhone has only 40% of the pixels in the N900.
 
Posts: 220 | Thanked: 129 times | Joined on Nov 2009
#72
[QUOTE=iJanne;390868]...as a computer or a netbook.

Enter N900 and Maemo 5.

Unlike some say, this is not Nokia's flagship phone. ...N900 is still a developer edition and was never meant to catch this much fire, I guess it surprised Nokia too that it did. Maemo is still at least that one release short of the consumer edition. And while I love the N900, I wouldn't recommend it for casual users. It is not for them. Maemo is not for them yet.

Did Nokia drop the ball with the development of S60? Yes they did...
...
Then, the expectations.
...
Clearly there are a lot of people here who bought the N900 to replace a smartphone, even the iPhone.
...
Nokia is releasing this for the developers and tech-heads, the next round of Maemo was meant for the regular consumer. ..N900 is there to activate the community and to help mature the platform, not yet the end-result.
...
Nokia's roadmap clearly states that Maemo 6 is the consumer release. Agreed, that may be late time-wise, but at least they are moving. Maemo 6, I don't think they can afford to miss, but anyone thinking Maemo 5 would release as a final product simply didn't read the big print in my opinion. This manifests itself in things like missing OVI support, missing features, Maemo is still short of the final Qt user-interface etc. This is all public info! QUOTE]



Although I don't want this to happen Nokia may risk dropping the ball on Maemo, too. Why? Paradoxically, because of the unexpected success of the N900, as it reaches out beyond what is the intended audience. Furthermore, Nokia isn't doing too well at the moment so I'm sure there is pressure internally to deliver more profit, and they will be opportunistic to capture the profit potential residing in the N900. There's the usual trade-off between short and long term gain.

I was in a phone store just the other day. They sell phones from all the big suppliers, and with most operating systems. I asked them about the N900. "Nokia had a demo for us. It's the most impressive phone we have ever seen." was the reply from the salesrep, eyes glowing.

If I'm a consumer, I will be impressed by the sales person's comment, and I may not read reviews, or the "public information" but rather go with my impressions from the sales guy, and the media in general, and Nokia's reputation for making solid phones. So I will buy it. I will expect it to do things it doesn't.

Then I discover Nokias new so called Maemo phones aren't what I expected. I will be disappointed, and I will be talking about my disappointment to others. One bad word carries the weight of ten good ones. And probably I will not buy the Maemo6 unit, either.

So the success of the N900 may cause trouble for Nokia. Today customer expectations drive the market more than ever. The competition is stiff, and word of mouth, and hype oounts.

The only way to continuously stay ahead of the game is to supersede customer expectations. Whether these expectations are right or wrong is irrelevant, they are expectations and they will put pressure on Nokia. The main pressure will be to provide the functions that perhaps are not intended to be in Maemo5, that consumers expect on todays "top of the line" phones, whether the Nokia wants the N900 to be seen as such or not.

I may be wrong. With the phone market being the phone market, where e.g. HTC contiously puts out products promising to deliver, and always are missing one or two features, or functionalities, or do them poorly etc, and still are able to prosper.

Nevertheless there is a risk that the success of the N900 will endanger the market perception of Maemo6 devices. I hope Nokia updates the Maemo5 to please consumers and keep faith in their platform. They can't afford to drop the ball this time, or they're dead. Greater companies have crumbled.

Last edited by Gadgety; 2009-11-26 at 09:51.
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Gadgety For This Useful Post:
Posts: 144 | Thanked: 266 times | Joined on Nov 2009
#73
Gadgety, and others who have voiced the same fear, your worry, I think, is warranted. Hopefully it won't go that way much, but it might...

Perhaps Nokia should have named or communicated the N900 a bit differently.
 
Banned | Posts: 537 | Thanked: 117 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ N900 LAND
#74
I have to disagree you cant make phone calls on the n900 well i cant.
 
MountainX's Avatar
Posts: 415 | Thanked: 193 times | Joined on Jun 2009 @ A place with no mountains
#75
Originally Posted by Megacrazy View Post
The point is that exactly as you said, older phones can do this just fine...and on this newer device it's supposed to be perfectly smooth...which it is not. That's the problem.

The 2nd problem is that there are other devices out there right now that do this perfectly smoothly giving Nokia 0 excuses.
Get some perspective:
http://www.phonescoop.com/articles/a...p?a=318&p=2284

The Droid uses a capacitive touch display, as do most Android phones. The Droid's touch interface was a little bit twitchy. I don't know if it was as screen issue or a processor/system issue, but every so often there were short gaps between pressing the screen and having the Droid react to what you wanted.

I noticed some slight stuttering and lag in screen transitions, especially from the home screen. Many will blame the processor for this. The Droid runs a Cortex A8 processor at 550MHz. Motorola claims that the processor can run up to 600MHz when required by certain tasks; 550MHz is merely the base speed.

Tech mumbo-jumbo aside, you may notice some laginess in the user interface and it isn't necessarily related to a bad touch screen.
__________________
Hi! I would like to help make your experience on these forums better. If I can help with anything, just ask!

Useful links for newcomers: New members say hello , New users start here, Community subforum, Beginners' wiki page, Maemo5 Intro, Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Choosing open source is an important purchasing decision for your future. The closed source model of computing is a form of exploitation -- of us! Open source empowers us. Be smart -- chose open source.
 
Posts: 98 | Thanked: 31 times | Joined on Nov 2009
#76
I can't see why Nokia can't update the N900 to 6, Apple seem to be able to do it with the iPhone. I can understand why they didn't invest in the 8xx with its different OMAP arch, but they really need to pick a product and back it all the way and build up a strong user base.

I just hope if Maemo 6 is developed around OMAP4, that the functions are similar enough to maintain both archs....
 
qole's Avatar
Moderator | Posts: 7,109 | Thanked: 8,820 times | Joined on Oct 2007 @ Vancouver, BC, Canada
#77
Originally Posted by nuknuk View Post
I have to disagree you cant make phone calls on the n900 well i cant.
Not even with the included headset?
__________________
qole.org --- twitter --- Easy Debian wiki page
Please don't send me a private message, post to the appropriate thread.
Thank you all for your donations!
 
dansus's Avatar
Posts: 279 | Thanked: 208 times | Joined on Aug 2009 @ London
#78
I have the feeling that im unique here in that i wanted the N900 because of the hardware.

Small form factor, usable hw keyboard, resistive touch screen, HSPA, OMAP, 3.5mm jack ect won the day for me. I think i wouldve bought the N900 no matter which OS it was running, the fact that its Maemo is just icing on the cake.

Hopefully in the not too distant future i will be able to run multiple OS's on it including, Mer and Android.
 
Posts: 242 | Thanked: 103 times | Joined on Nov 2009 @ Sheffield, UK
#79
Originally Posted by dansus View Post
I have the feeling that im unique here in that i wanted the N900 because of the hardware.

Small form factor, usable hw keyboard, resistive touch screen, HSPA, OMAP, 3.5mm jack ect won the day for me. I think i wouldve bought the N900 no matter which OS it was running, the fact that its Maemo is just icing on the cake.

Hopefully in the not too distant future i will be able to run multiple OS's on it including, Mer and Android.
Not unique at all..I feel exactly the same. I had been looking for a replacement for my E90 and the N97 just didn't cut it - processor was anaemic (would need to compress videos to watch them), keyboard didn't appeal to me. The N900 met all my hardware needs and the OS it ran was not terribly important.
 
Posts: 14 | Thanked: 15 times | Joined on Nov 2009
#80
N900 : best hardware + best operating system
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 14:11.