|
2009-11-26
, 09:45
|
Posts: 220 |
Thanked: 129 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#72
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Gadgety For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2009-11-26
, 09:48
|
Posts: 144 |
Thanked: 266 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#73
|
|
2009-11-26
, 10:01
|
Banned |
Posts: 537 |
Thanked: 117 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ N900 LAND
|
#74
|
|
2009-11-26
, 20:51
|
|
Posts: 415 |
Thanked: 193 times |
Joined on Jun 2009
@ A place with no mountains
|
#75
|
The point is that exactly as you said, older phones can do this just fine...and on this newer device it's supposed to be perfectly smooth...which it is not. That's the problem.
The 2nd problem is that there are other devices out there right now that do this perfectly smoothly giving Nokia 0 excuses.
The Droid uses a capacitive touch display, as do most Android phones. The Droid's touch interface was a little bit twitchy. I don't know if it was as screen issue or a processor/system issue, but every so often there were short gaps between pressing the screen and having the Droid react to what you wanted.
I noticed some slight stuttering and lag in screen transitions, especially from the home screen. Many will blame the processor for this. The Droid runs a Cortex A8 processor at 550MHz. Motorola claims that the processor can run up to 600MHz when required by certain tasks; 550MHz is merely the base speed.
Tech mumbo-jumbo aside, you may notice some laginess in the user interface and it isn't necessarily related to a bad touch screen.
|
2009-11-26
, 21:10
|
Posts: 98 |
Thanked: 31 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#76
|
|
2009-11-26
, 22:48
|
|
Moderator |
Posts: 7,109 |
Thanked: 8,820 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Vancouver, BC, Canada
|
#77
|
|
2009-11-26
, 23:17
|
|
Posts: 279 |
Thanked: 208 times |
Joined on Aug 2009
@ London
|
#78
|
|
2009-11-26
, 23:23
|
Posts: 242 |
Thanked: 103 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Sheffield, UK
|
#79
|
I have the feeling that im unique here in that i wanted the N900 because of the hardware.
Small form factor, usable hw keyboard, resistive touch screen, HSPA, OMAP, 3.5mm jack ect won the day for me. I think i wouldve bought the N900 no matter which OS it was running, the fact that its Maemo is just icing on the cake.
Hopefully in the not too distant future i will be able to run multiple OS's on it including, Mer and Android.
|
2009-11-26
, 23:31
|
Posts: 14 |
Thanked: 15 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#80
|
- iPhone 3GS: = 480x320 = 153600 pixels
- N900: 800x480 = 384000 pixels
The iPhone has only 40% of the pixels in the N900.