Notices


Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 116 | Thanked: 86 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ New Orleans, LA, USA
#71
@shinkamui prefers touch.facebook.com. I would like to at some point create a simple "dedicated" application. Any other devs want to work on such a project with me? Might be a great time and opportunity for me to learn python.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to shinkamui For This Useful Post:
Posts: 107 | Thanked: 21 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ India . Mumbai
#72
Originally Posted by bcjenkins View Post
Try using the "Touch" interface too

http://touch.facebook.com

B
Thanks mate..Now its fast and Cool!
 
Posts: 193 | Thanked: 61 times | Joined on Jan 2010
#73
Originally Posted by SubCore View Post
i believe FB & co keep the mobile/light sites intentionally feature-poor, so the dedicated apps sell better...

and it works, as proven by this thread.
Yeah, especially for low end phones too, that way mobile phone sellers can market their low end phones and sell it by stating it "does Facebook" as a lot people are happy with a phone that just does Facebook and twitter.

I doubt Facebook will make the mobile version, and touch version better because they want it to run on low end phones too.

Facebook lite doesn't cut it as sending message is very basic, no photo uploads to the message for example, or at least I couldn't see it. Though I'm not sure if Facebook apps have that feature?

Last edited by m165; 2010-03-03 at 17:01.
 
JohnLF's Avatar
Posts: 551 | Thanked: 507 times | Joined on Feb 2010 @ North West England
#74
Originally Posted by Seraphic View Post
touch.facebook.com is best for just Browsing. It's quick too.
Brill. Wish I'd known about this earlier - bye bye facebook widget!
 
Hossie's Avatar
Posts: 103 | Thanked: 20 times | Joined on Jan 2008
#75
You could also vote for Gravity.

http://gravity.uservoice.com/forums/19052-general

It also has Facebook-Support.
 
Posts: 1,096 | Thanked: 760 times | Joined on Dec 2008
#76
between

touch.facebook.com
facebook plugin for conversations
facebook sharing service

I feel pretty well covered for facebook on n900 and see no need for a dedicated program. That said, the app for symbian is basically a WRT widget that I am sure facebook(or someone else) could port to something for maemo quite easily
 
Posts: 62 | Thanked: 12 times | Joined on Jan 2010
#77
a few changes i'd like to see:

- commenting on friends status on the widget (without opening up the web browser to do this).
- updating our own status straight from the widget (without opening up web browser).
- composing and sending personal messages on the widget (without opening up web browser).

I'd like to see the widget be more functional instead of sitting there displaying updates.
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 16:58.