Active Topics
-
[HOWTO] Comprehensive Firmware Flashing Guide for N9 (1,580)
to Nokia N9 / N950 by aspergerguy - 11 hrs, 38 mins ago -
Nokia N9-00 Prototype Build S1.12 (RM-680 codename "Dali") (250)
to Nokia N9 / N950 by en0s - 3 days, 8 hrs ago -
[Announce] Maebble - Pebble support for Maemo (118)
to Applications by glo-worm - 3 days, 20 hrs ago -
Possible to flash Leste to eMMC? (6)
to Maemo 7 / Leste by Eri - 4 days, 10 hrs ago - more...
|
2010-01-01
, 22:56
|
|
Posts: 117 |
Thanked: 23 times |
Joined on Aug 2008
@ Hardenberg
|
#72
|
Hmmm.. Installed Firefox and weaver and adblock. I installes fennec befoe on my N810. My secret phrase was again??? Took me a lot of time in trial and error. Not very 'intuitive' there. That's no problem, but the usage of the browser is: the loading time for each new page is not appropriate for me. MicroB got me spoiled apparantly. I saw some results form syncing Weaver with my desktop, it seems to work, at least in a way.. But using firefox? Crome on my PC is way faster IMO. Moreover, MicroB started to slow down as well!! Memory problems? I un-installed ff mobile, rebooted and MicroB is back to normal. Sorry I'll just stay with MicroB again...
|
|
2010-01-01
, 23:03
|
|
Posts: 2,829 |
Thanked: 1,459 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Finland
|
#73
|
[iīm using n900]
I donīt understand people praising MicroB speed. In my opinion itīs quite slow. It shouldnīt take more than ~5s to load for example slashdot.org.
btw.
Why it feels that scrolling and overall responsivness in microb (when page is loaded) is faster than scrolling in menus,pictures, desktops etc. When scrolling imagelist with thumbnails I can see tearing and its bit jerky.
..edit
Sorry for offtopic.
I donīt understand people praising MicroB speed. In my opinion itīs quite slow. It shouldnīt take more than ~5s to load for example slashdot.org.
btw.
Why it feels that scrolling and overall responsivness in microb (when page is loaded) is faster than scrolling in menus,pictures, desktops etc. When scrolling imagelist with thumbnails I can see tearing and its bit jerky.
..edit
Sorry for offtopic.
|
|
2010-01-01
, 23:18
|
|
Posts: 2,014 |
Thanked: 1,581 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#74
|
Originally Posted by slender
Um it takes me 6 seconds to load slashdot from pressing enter using firefox on my Quad Core desktop with 4gb RAM. So expecting Microb to do it in 5 seconds is a bit much dont you think?
[iīm using n900]
I donīt understand people praising MicroB speed. In my opinion itīs quite slow. It shouldnīt take more than ~5s to load for example slashdot.org.
btw.
Why it feels that scrolling and overall responsivness in microb (when page is loaded) is faster than scrolling in menus,pictures, desktops etc. When scrolling imagelist with thumbnails I can see tearing and its bit jerky.
..edit
Sorry for offtopic.
__________________
Class .. : Power Poster, Potential Coder
Humor .. : [*********] Alignment: Chaotic Evil
Patience : [***-------] Weapon(s): +2 Logic Mace
Agro ... : |*****-----] Relic(s) : G1, N900
Class .. : Power Poster, Potential Coder
Humor .. : [*********] Alignment: Chaotic Evil
Patience : [***-------] Weapon(s): +2 Logic Mace
Agro ... : |*****-----] Relic(s) : G1, N900
|
|
2010-01-01
, 23:21
|
|
Posts: 4,556 |
Thanked: 1,624 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#75
|
Originally Posted by colnago
How do you use Near Me? It's not like geolocation where it has its own window.
Near Me is definately using GPS...it returns the house numbers on my street.
Even Google Latitude reports me in Texas. o.O. Makes me think it's a problem with Fennec itself.
__________________
Originally Posted by ysss
They're maemo and MeeGo...
"Meamo!" sounds like what Zorro would say to catherine zeta jones... after she slaps him for looking at her dirtily...
|
|
2010-01-01
, 23:21
|
|
Posts: 1,255 |
Thanked: 393 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ US
|
#76
|
Originally Posted by Bratag
Does it even work? I did not notice any performance benefit with Adblock. User error?
I think the line there is IF its rendered completely. Just a couple of test I did on pages I often go to. All tests done over wifi.
Slashdot.org
MicroB: 15 seconds to render entire page
Fennec; 40 seconds
Engadget.com
MicroB: 18 seconds
Fennec: 2+ minutes - I gave up.
Add to that the fact that I can scroll the loaded content as it loads on Micro B and you have a far better experience with it over fennec.
Also I havent had any issues with adblock on MicroB. Perhaps just lucky.
|
|
2010-01-01
, 23:31
|
|
Posts: 2,829 |
Thanked: 1,459 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Finland
|
#77
|
Originally Posted by Bratag
Something wrong with your computer? With my pentium 1,5Ghz 512mb after getting connection to page it takes about 1-3 seconds to render. Using windows xp sp3 and firefox 3.5.6
Um it takes me 6 seconds to load slashdot from pressing enter using firefox on my Quad Core desktop with 4gb RAM. So expecting Microb to do it in 5 seconds is a bit much dont you think?
No it's not too much.
|
|
2010-01-01
, 23:45
|
|
Posts: 4,556 |
Thanked: 1,624 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#78
|
Takes me 3 seconds (or rather 3 Mississippi) on a Dual Core system with 1 GB of RAM (running latest 32 bit Ubuntu and a nightly build of Firefox).
It's probably more dependent on your internet connection if anything. Verizon DSL here.
It's probably more dependent on your internet connection if anything. Verizon DSL here.
__________________
Originally Posted by ysss
They're maemo and MeeGo...
"Meamo!" sounds like what Zorro would say to catherine zeta jones... after she slaps him for looking at her dirtily...
|
|
2010-01-02
, 00:04
|
|
Posts: 2,014 |
Thanked: 1,581 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#79
|
Originally Posted by slender
I test from the moment I hit enter - not when the connection is established as the creation of the tab etc I consider part of rendering.
Something wrong with your computer? With my pentium 1,5Ghz 512mb after getting connection to page it takes about 1-3 seconds to render. Using windows xp sp3 and firefox 3.5.6
No it's not too much.
__________________
Class .. : Power Poster, Potential Coder
Humor .. : [*********] Alignment: Chaotic Evil
Patience : [***-------] Weapon(s): +2 Logic Mace
Agro ... : |*****-----] Relic(s) : G1, N900
Class .. : Power Poster, Potential Coder
Humor .. : [*********] Alignment: Chaotic Evil
Patience : [***-------] Weapon(s): +2 Logic Mace
Agro ... : |*****-----] Relic(s) : G1, N900
|
|
2010-01-02
, 00:33
|
|
Posts: 518 |
Thanked: 160 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#80
|
Originally Posted by Laughing Man
With Near Me, I drag my finger from dead area of the 900, on the "right", onto active area of the screen. This pulls up the menu bar, where Near Me has an icon (picture of the little house above the "settings" button)...click on it, and its "interface" opens. You can click on the preset searches "coffee, pizza, libraries, etc", or just type in your own.
How do you use Near Me? It's not like geolocation where it has its own window.
Even Google Latitude reports me in Texas. o.O. Makes me think it's a problem with Fennec itself.
You may be getting location wrong via "IP" becuase it seems like T-Mo has regional APNs. Internet2.voicestream.com has me making "speedtests" somewhere in Kansas. epc.tmobile.com gets closer, but its somewhere in New Jersey...I'm in Maryland.
 |
| Tags |
| firefox, firefox rc1 sucks, stop making junk tags |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:01.
I think the line there is IF its rendered completely. Just a couple of test I did on pages I often go to. All tests done over wifi.
Slashdot.org
MicroB: 15 seconds to render entire page
Fennec; 40 seconds
Engadget.com
MicroB: 18 seconds
Fennec: 2+ minutes - I gave up.
Add to that the fact that I can scroll the loaded content as it loads on Micro B and you have a far better experience with it over fennec.
Also I havent had any issues with adblock on MicroB. Perhaps just lucky.
Class .. : Power Poster, Potential Coder
Humor .. : [*********] Alignment: Chaotic Evil
Patience : [***-------] Weapon(s): +2 Logic Mace
Agro ... : |*****-----] Relic(s) : G1, N900