![]() |
2010-01-01
, 22:56
|
Posts: 117 |
Thanked: 23 times |
Joined on Aug 2008
@ Hardenberg
|
#72
|
![]() |
2010-01-01
, 23:03
|
Posts: 2,829 |
Thanked: 1,459 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Finland
|
#73
|
![]() |
2010-01-01
, 23:18
|
Posts: 2,014 |
Thanked: 1,581 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#74
|
[iīm using n900]
I donīt understand people praising MicroB speed. In my opinion itīs quite slow. It shouldnīt take more than ~5s to load for example slashdot.org.
btw.
Why it feels that scrolling and overall responsivness in microb (when page is loaded) is faster than scrolling in menus,pictures, desktops etc. When scrolling imagelist with thumbnails I can see tearing and its bit jerky.
..edit
Sorry for offtopic.
![]() |
2010-01-01
, 23:21
|
Posts: 4,556 |
Thanked: 1,624 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#75
|
Near Me is definately using GPS...it returns the house numbers on my street.
![]() |
2010-01-01
, 23:21
|
Posts: 1,255 |
Thanked: 393 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ US
|
#76
|
I think the line there is IF its rendered completely. Just a couple of test I did on pages I often go to. All tests done over wifi.
Slashdot.org
MicroB: 15 seconds to render entire page
Fennec; 40 seconds
Engadget.com
MicroB: 18 seconds
Fennec: 2+ minutes - I gave up.
Add to that the fact that I can scroll the loaded content as it loads on Micro B and you have a far better experience with it over fennec.
Also I havent had any issues with adblock on MicroB. Perhaps just lucky.
![]() |
2010-01-01
, 23:31
|
Posts: 2,829 |
Thanked: 1,459 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Finland
|
#77
|
Um it takes me 6 seconds to load slashdot from pressing enter using firefox on my Quad Core desktop with 4gb RAM. So expecting Microb to do it in 5 seconds is a bit much dont you think?
![]() |
2010-01-01
, 23:45
|
Posts: 4,556 |
Thanked: 1,624 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#78
|
![]() |
2010-01-02
, 00:04
|
Posts: 2,014 |
Thanked: 1,581 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#79
|
Something wrong with your computer? With my pentium 1,5Ghz 512mb after getting connection to page it takes about 1-3 seconds to render. Using windows xp sp3 and firefox 3.5.6
No it's not too much.
![]() |
2010-01-02
, 00:33
|
Posts: 518 |
Thanked: 160 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#80
|
How do you use Near Me? It's not like geolocation where it has its own window.
Even Google Latitude reports me in Texas. o.O. Makes me think it's a problem with Fennec itself.
![]() |
Tags |
firefox, firefox rc1 sucks, stop making junk tags |
|
I think the line there is IF its rendered completely. Just a couple of test I did on pages I often go to. All tests done over wifi.
Slashdot.org
MicroB: 15 seconds to render entire page
Fennec; 40 seconds
Engadget.com
MicroB: 18 seconds
Fennec: 2+ minutes - I gave up.
Add to that the fact that I can scroll the loaded content as it loads on Micro B and you have a far better experience with it over fennec.
Also I havent had any issues with adblock on MicroB. Perhaps just lucky.
Class .. : Power Poster, Potential Coder
Humor .. : [*********] Alignment: Chaotic Evil
Patience : [***-------] Weapon(s): +2 Logic Mace
Agro ... : |*****-----] Relic(s) : G1, N900