|
2010-01-20
, 02:11
|
Posts: 271 |
Thanked: 220 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#72
|
|
2010-01-20
, 04:15
|
Posts: 55 |
Thanked: 3 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Reno
|
#73
|
|
2010-01-20
, 04:46
|
|
Posts: 794 |
Thanked: 784 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ /Canada/Ontario/GTA
|
#74
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to EIPI For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-01-20
, 05:04
|
Posts: 55 |
Thanked: 3 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Reno
|
#75
|
|
2010-01-20
, 05:21
|
Posts: 55 |
Thanked: 3 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Reno
|
#76
|
|
2010-01-20
, 05:35
|
Posts: 10 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#77
|
|
2010-01-20
, 05:36
|
Posts: 55 |
Thanked: 3 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Reno
|
#78
|
|
2010-01-20
, 05:37
|
Posts: 170 |
Thanked: 75 times |
Joined on Jun 2008
@ NYC
|
#79
|
|
2010-01-20
, 06:10
|
Posts: 116 |
Thanked: 86 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ New Orleans, LA, USA
|
#80
|
And i really dont think that TMo would show a different operators name *while* its their own network which is being used.
Something is definitely odd, lets see if other users in Reno see the same.