|
2010-02-11
, 08:08
|
|
Posts: 4,274 |
Thanked: 5,358 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ Looking at y'all and sighing
|
#72
|
I'll post a diff file over the next few days if anyone wants to play around. It's a working audio player. Videos are sound only at the moment; Nokia didn't bother to send the video to the screen, but that's generally a simple fix when using gstreamer.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to qwerty12 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-02-11
, 10:10
|
|
Posts: 474 |
Thanked: 368 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#73
|
So, can someone explain, in layman's terms, why the media player is such a resource hog
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to niqbal For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-02-11
, 14:04
|
Posts: 247 |
Thanked: 91 times |
Joined on Jan 2008
@ London/M4 Corridor
|
#74
|
And, as someone else pointed out, the media player doesn't pause the music when a phone call comes in - how stupid is that??
The Following User Says Thank You to Alan_Peery For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-02-11
, 14:11
|
Posts: 2,014 |
Thanked: 1,581 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#75
|
People get frustrated and post their anger because the device does not do as it has been advertised. Rushing the half baked device is the reason for this. Open source is not answer to the woes of the N900. You use open source to enhance the inherent functionality of the device. What Nokia has thrown in the market is a device with unfinished thought and thinking.There was lot of Hype on N900 and lot of people wanted to change from iphone etc to the new device which on paper looked great and lot of people fell for that. However the bar was set high by iphone or similar devices and when they start using N900 , after the initial jubilation of owning a fantastic hardware the realization start sinking in that this device needs 3 to 4 software revs before it can be useful. Some people have patience to wait this out some people do not have and hence the frustration comes out. This device is diamond in rough. IT is upto Nokia and not mameo forum to make this polished device and frankly Nokia's commitment to continue development of symbian and mameo together is really questionable in long term and this period uncertanity will hurt mameo platform more than Symbian.
I am still holding on to N900 for next rev of software and then will decide to keep it or go back to Nexus/Iphone land again. Because if they do not fix the issues mentioned in the mameo forum for N900 then it is pointless to keep this device for just phone function. This is humble opinion.
Thanks for reading.
|
2010-02-11
, 14:17
|
|
Posts: 44 |
Thanked: 13 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#76
|
|
2010-02-11
, 14:24
|
Posts: 2,829 |
Thanked: 1,459 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Finland
|
#77
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to slender For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-02-11
, 14:44
|
Posts: 296 |
Thanked: 126 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ New York City
|
#78
|
for the heck of it, i ran a simple test. with only media player running cpu usage to run a music file is around ~20-23 %, when u start a new song cpu went as high as ~50% dopping down to normal range thats by keeping playback instant.
in layman terms, with 256 MB + 768 MB available to n900 u will have to have abt 512+ used somewhere before music stutters starting a song and abt 750MB used somewhere before music playback stutters. good luck with that.
|
2010-02-11
, 15:08
|
|
Posts: 2,427 |
Thanked: 2,986 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#79
|
The Following User Says Thank You to daperl For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-02-11
, 15:12
|
Posts: 77 |
Thanked: 38 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#80
|
Actually the N900 was ne of the LEAST hyped Nokia devices ever released. It was almost as if they were purposely keeping it very low key. Advertising was almost nil prior to release.
This has been said so many times before, but if the reason you bought the N900 was to replace an iPhone that you already liked - you were always going to be disappointed. The N900 was in no way aimed at the iPhone crowd.
Finally my whole point in this thread has been that posting the same whining comment over and over and over in new thread after new thread after new thread, does NOTHING to help the situation and just makes you seem like a whiner - which is more than likely exactly what they are.
Personally I will be extremely happy when the "Oooh shiny toy" crowd gets rid of the device and thins out a little. Then the people who are actually serious about making Maemo the most hacker friendly and ultimately user friendly OS available can get down to business without having to explain to whiners what being an early adopter means.
The Following User Says Thank You to tnhh For This Useful Post: | ||
Tags |
waiting impatiently |
|
ipod/iphone
album artist -> album
title1 - artist1 - albumart
title2 - artist2 - ..
N900
artist / album
title1 - albumart
title2 - ..
I hope you can see the difference and why music tagged for one device will not be sorted by another device as expected. Personally ipod method is better because it involves assigning multiple artists for the same song title which is not available for n900.
In n900, using a software like mp3tag. Use Artist Tag (in place of album artist tag), you can use extended tags for album art but i think you already have that covered so good job on that front.
and thats primarily it. I hope it gets your music organized