|
2011-07-13
, 06:13
|
Posts: 60 |
Thanked: 8 times |
Joined on Nov 2010
|
#72
|
|
2011-07-13
, 08:08
|
|
Posts: 549 |
Thanked: 299 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
@ Australian in the Philippines
|
#73
|
|
2011-07-13
, 17:06
|
Posts: 60 |
Thanked: 8 times |
Joined on Nov 2010
|
#74
|
|
2011-07-15
, 05:49
|
Posts: 60 |
Thanked: 8 times |
Joined on Nov 2010
|
#76
|
|
2011-07-15
, 16:26
|
|
Posts: 5,028 |
Thanked: 8,613 times |
Joined on Mar 2011
|
#77
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Estel For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-07-15
, 23:38
|
Posts: 60 |
Thanked: 8 times |
Joined on Nov 2010
|
#78
|
|
2011-07-20
, 17:12
|
Posts: 60 |
Thanked: 8 times |
Joined on Nov 2010
|
#79
|
|
2011-07-21
, 05:08
|
Posts: 60 |
Thanked: 8 times |
Joined on Nov 2010
|
#80
|
Lets be pretty clear on one thing, even if you could manage to complete dd if=/dev/random of=/dev/mtd<0 through to 5> before the N900 borked itself, you can still cold flash it back to a working state. It is indeed a temperamental machine at times, but it is also incredibly user proof.
The only real reason you would be unable to flash would be hardware failure, though you haven't posted anything to indicate this is the case at all.
Keep trying.