Active Topics
-
The N900 is now 15 years old! (7)
to Nokia N900 by Danct12 - 3 days, 19 hrs ago -
Sailfish OS for the Motorola Moto G7 Power (XT1955-5) - (ocean) (4)
to SailfishOS by Maemish - 4 days, 15 hrs ago - more...
| The Following User Says Thank You to Netweaver For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-01-20
, 23:38
|
|
Posts: 1,400 |
Thanked: 3,751 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Arctic cold of northern .fi
|
#72
|
Originally Posted by wmarone
That would be about 4" screen. Perfectly fine size for smartphone screen.
That's a disappointing screen size and resolution :/
Screen sizes are reported diagonal.
| The Following User Says Thank You to Rauha For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2011-01-20
, 23:42
|
|
Banned |
Posts: 974 |
Thanked: 622 times |
Joined on Oct 2010
|
#73
|
Intel is the logical choice for the N9 and MeeGo. But logic has never stopped Nokia from making weird stuff 
 |
|
2011-01-20
, 23:45
|
|
Posts: 1,885 |
Thanked: 2,008 times |
Joined on Aug 2009
@ OVI MAPS
|
#74
|
here is a conversation about nCDK when it was first introduced in the meego QA meeting
not sure it sheds much light on anything but its interesting
iCDK is publicly available version of nCDK
none will be the N9-00 sound like they are reference platforms for development along with the N900
Last edited by NvyUs; 2011-01-20 at 23:50.
not sure it sheds much light on anything but its interesting
iCDK is publicly available version of nCDK
none will be the N9-00 sound like they are reference platforms for development along with the N900
Code:
07:27:49 <V-PV> #topic New Reference HW added for Core and Handheld UX 07:28:00 <vilvo> sure 07:28:17 <V-PV> #info We have new reference HW in use for Core and Handheld UX in 1.2, called nCDK 07:28:22 <Tahvo> May: I need your input too... 07:28:31 <V-PV> #info first test results are already in qa-reports 07:29:01 <May> yes. nCDK and also iCDK are new reference platform for 1.2 07:29:30 <V-PV> Right, I forgot the iCDK, sorry. :-) 07:30:15 <V-PV> #info iCDK is "publicly available version of nCDK" 07:30:29 <V-PV> Any questions / comments about this topic 07:30:50 <V-PV> I think valhalla_ will tell more about this today in TSG meeting (I hope). 07:31:01 <May> We already have test plan in place to test nCDK and iCDK, so no questions from my side. 07:31:32 <V-PV> But anyhow, so that you do not wonder, we have added one (or actyally two) HWs to MeeGo 1.2 07:31:44 <Aparna> is there going to be a variant platform for iCDK? 07:31:51 <Stskeeps> i'm happy since we'll have a IA target to compare n900 tests with again finally :) 07:32:21 <V-PV> #info nCDK and iCDK are IA based platforms 07:32:21 <yppaper> what is the "priority one" device to be used? 07:32:22 <May> Aparna, not clear to me. 07:32:57 <V-PV> #info nCDK is priority platform for QA 07:33:04 <Aparna> Are we going to have separate images for iCDK or the same MeeGo public image should work 07:33:24 <May> As i know same image. 07:33:26 <V-PV> Aparna: We will have separate images 07:33:40 <May> Different answers :) 07:33:51 <V-PV> May: do you mean for iCDK and nCDK having same image? 07:33:57 <May> Yes. 07:34:14 <V-PV> N900 is ARM and nCDK is IA, definetly different image :-) 07:34:18 <V-PV> May: Ok 07:34:36 <V-PV> Next toppic then
Last edited by NvyUs; 2011-01-20 at 23:50.
| The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to NvyUs For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2011-01-20
, 23:52
|
|
Posts: 1,746 |
Thanked: 2,100 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#75
|
Originally Posted by Rauha
I know. And if you look at the N900's conf file, it's lower DPI but a touch higher resolution. So it's ~4" but no real increase in DPI like the jump for the iPhone 4, which I had kinda hoped for.
That would be about 4" screen. Perfectly fine size for smartphone screen.
Screen sizes are reported diagonal.
Of course, the Blaze SDK has similar panels and that says nothing about any handsets based on the OMAP4 so I'm not going to bank on anything here.
|
|
2011-01-20
, 23:53
|
|
Posts: 1,463 |
Thanked: 1,916 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
@ Edmonton, AB
|
#76
|
Originally Posted by Netweaver
That c0 phone with the leaked pics rumored to be the n9 was definitely running symbian though...
some more info, I do recall having seen a China sourced picture of a Nokia device showing "C0" as the model name. I can't find the picture back directly for it and looks like it was the real deal after all, at least for the nCDK, who knows for the N9
Source : http://bugs.meego.com/show_bug.cgi?id=10385 Comment 6
Funny, all this activity, all these hints everywhere. And it would be only for the (N9+1) nth generation device ? Hard to believe ...
|
|
2011-01-20
, 23:58
|
|
Posts: 1,885 |
Thanked: 2,008 times |
Joined on Aug 2009
@ OVI MAPS
|
#77
|
it turned out to be the E7 that proto what leaked with C0 on it
any way why have they dropped using the AAVA atom devices and moved to new references devices for 1.2 development is the question i want to know
Maybe AAVA found someone willing to commercialise their devices?
Last edited by NvyUs; 2011-01-21 at 00:02.
any way why have they dropped using the AAVA atom devices and moved to new references devices for 1.2 development is the question i want to know
Maybe AAVA found someone willing to commercialise their devices?
Last edited by NvyUs; 2011-01-21 at 00:02.
|
|
2011-01-21
, 00:04
|
|
Posts: 1,463 |
Thanked: 1,916 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
@ Edmonton, AB
|
#78
|
Originally Posted by NvyUs
reference platform doesn't mean it's not going to make it to retail / production
here is a conversation about nCDK when it was first introduced in the meego QA meeting
not sure it sheds much light on anything but its interesting
iCDK is publicly available version of nCDK
none will be the N9-00 sound like they are reference platforms for development along with the N900
...
look at google nexus phone
|
|
2011-01-21
, 00:09
|
|
Posts: 3,664 |
Thanked: 1,530 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Hamilton, New Zealand
|
#79
|
N9 will fail if it is running Atom CPU 
*battery hogging
*Bad Architecture for mobile
*Heat SINK needed
*Crashes
*Slow
*HD ready? rec and enc
I prefer ARM CPU instead.. DUAL CORES!!! MMMMmmm
*battery hogging
*Bad Architecture for mobile
*Heat SINK needed
*Crashes
*Slow
*HD ready? rec and enc
I prefer ARM CPU instead.. DUAL CORES!!! MMMMmmm
__________________
Install Preenv games into eMMC| Click Here to get rid of Uboot screen
My N900 running at 250-1150Mhz
Unlocking your FM-transmitter to 76.0Mhz - 107.9Mhz range - CLICK HERE.
Install Preenv games into eMMC| Click Here to get rid of Uboot screen
My N900 running at 250-1150Mhz
Unlocking your FM-transmitter to 76.0Mhz - 107.9Mhz range - CLICK HERE.
|
|
2011-01-21
, 00:10
|
|
Posts: 1,746 |
Thanked: 2,100 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#80
|
Originally Posted by NvyUs
Honestly I have yet to see anything that says these aren't just code names for the Aava platforms. They even have a 2nd gen coming that Nokia et. al. could easily get their hands on early in the dev cycle. And yes I'm aware there's a seperate .conf for aava, but there's also no "iCDK" conf
it turned out to be the E7 that proto what leaked with C0 on it
any way why have they dropped using the AAVA atom devices and moved to new references devices for 1.2 development is the question i want to know
Maybe AAVA found someone willing to commercialise their devices?
Source : http://bugs.meego.com/show_bug.cgi?id=10385 Comment 6