![]() |
2012-01-27
, 15:31
|
|
Posts: 2,121 |
Thanked: 1,540 times |
Joined on Mar 2008
@ Oxford, UK
|
#71
|
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to pelago For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2012-01-27
, 18:53
|
Posts: 1,523 |
Thanked: 1,997 times |
Joined on Jul 2011
@ not your mom's FOSS basement
|
#72
|
Can I also vote for not deleting one-time alarms after they've gone off. For my use case, I have a few non-repeating alarms defined in the stock clock, e.g. for 7.15am, 7.30am, 7.45am etc. Depending on when I need to get up the next day (which doesn't fit any particular pattern, so I cannot use repeating alarms), I tick to activate the required alarm from my list of saved alarms. This is much quicker than having to set the time from scratch. The alarm goes off the next day, is deactivated, but is not deleted, so that I can use it again in the future. For me, that behaviour is perfect.
![]() |
2012-01-29
, 10:54
|
Posts: 1,100 |
Thanked: 2,797 times |
Joined on Apr 2011
@ Netherlands
|
#73
|
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to ade For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2012-01-29
, 11:12
|
|
Posts: 5,028 |
Thanked: 8,613 times |
Joined on Mar 2011
|
#74
|
One final attempt to get things going the right direction.
No more requests for extra features like seconds added.
![]() |
2012-01-29
, 12:54
|
Posts: 1,100 |
Thanked: 2,797 times |
Joined on Apr 2011
@ Netherlands
|
#75
|
Why? It turned out quite good, and it seems that everybody is happy now.
sorry, but this is a big nonsense. Now people have choice between:
a) clock with seconds, but without one-time alarms staying active.
b) clock without seconds, but with one-time alarms disappearing
Yea, i know that everyone can go and learn to code, but IMO this latest change is irrational, as seconds (*not* resulting in any increased CPU wakeups) was very popular feature.
I'm not sure, but it seems that You're a little too affected by negating lusers like ed_boner.
/Estel
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to ade For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2012-01-29
, 13:32
|
|
Posts: 254 |
Thanked: 146 times |
Joined on Dec 2010
@ Antwerp Belgium
|
#76
|
One final attempt to get things going the right direction.
No more requests for extra features like seconds added.
The Following User Says Thank You to peter2p For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2012-01-29
, 13:52
|
Posts: 1,100 |
Thanked: 2,797 times |
Joined on Apr 2011
@ Netherlands
|
#77
|
Hi ade, just saw your screenshots at the first post with the new update.
The icons look very good...
I read the last posts and can imagine it must be a difficult choice for you to please everyone here.
At the moment I'm very happy with the seconds and no background but that is my personal opinion.
Like you said...
This nice extra you created runs perfect besides CSSU for the moment but I can understand you wanting to set a goal.
I'll stick to the previous version for the moment but never the less thx for the update.
The Following User Says Thank You to ade For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2012-01-29
, 13:57
|
|
Posts: 5,028 |
Thanked: 8,613 times |
Joined on Mar 2011
|
#78
|
![]() |
2012-01-29
, 14:08
|
|
Posts: 254 |
Thanked: 146 times |
Joined on Dec 2010
@ Antwerp Belgium
|
#79
|
Logical choice for you. The code itself is not lost, so decisions on where to go can be altered if required.
![]() |
2012-01-29
, 14:28
|
Posts: 1,100 |
Thanked: 2,797 times |
Joined on Apr 2011
@ Netherlands
|
#80
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to ade For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
Tags |
clock-ui, replacement, worldclock |
|