![]() |
2013-08-26
, 15:25
|
|
Posts: 2,222 |
Thanked: 12,651 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
@ SOL 3
|
#72
|
The Following 29 Users Say Thank You to joerg_rw For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2013-08-26
, 15:33
|
Posts: 466 |
Thanked: 661 times |
Joined on Jan 2009
|
#73
|
![]() |
2013-08-26
, 15:38
|
Posts: 10 |
Thanked: 81 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Espoo
|
#74
|
The Following 52 Users Say Thank You to FatPhil For This Useful Post: | ||
AapoRantalainen, ajalkane, Amboss, bingomion, Copernicus, cproc, Creamy Goodness, DA5, Daneel, dos1, enne30, foobar, freemangordon, fw190, handaxe, jessi3k3, joerg_rw, Jordi, jurop88, Ken-Young, kinchan, klinglerware, koznj, laasonen, luf, MaddogG, MartinK, mece, mrsellout, mr_pingu, nicolai, Nilli, NokiaFanatic, OVK, peterleinchen, prosetheus, rcolistete, reinob, Russe89, shabr, shawnjefferson, skanky, szopin, szymeczek34, tangent, The Wizard of Huz, wicket, wumpwoast, xusc, zapotek, Zero Six, zod |
![]() |
2013-08-26
, 15:44
|
|
Posts: 257 |
Thanked: 2,053 times |
Joined on Sep 2010
@ Warsaw, Poland
|
#75
|
Last not least the idea been to keep fremantle as OS since it's tested and known to finally work sufficiently bug free (recall early fremantle version like PR1.0, and the funny little bugs we had in it, anybody?). We neither gonna change that for new OS versions that maybe have look and feel of fremantle but a new untested "engine under the hood", nor will we change CPU family which as well would need such "new engine".
![]() |
2013-08-26
, 15:50
|
Posts: 3,074 |
Thanked: 12,964 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
@ Sofia,Bulgaria
|
#76
|
This idea appeals to me. I'm ex-Nokia, maemo/meego/... kernel team, and would be willing to spend some of my free time assisting with kernel and low-level-user-space issues. (If you need a kernel tree maintainer, that was much of my job for the last 2 years in Nokia, for example.) I can probably pull in a few volunteers from the ex kernel team, I'm still in touch with many of them.
To be honest, I'm not a huge fan of much of the n900 userspace, some of it's as buggy as crap, and is painfully bloaty, so I don't think people should be getting too attached to it. But yes, my n900 is my daily device, and has been for about 4 years. It's almost falling to pieces, but i've made sure I've got spares so that I never have to be without one.
The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to freemangordon For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2013-08-26
, 15:51
|
|
Posts: 2,222 |
Thanked: 12,651 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
@ SOL 3
|
#77
|
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to joerg_rw For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2013-08-26
, 16:13
|
Posts: 1,431 |
Thanked: 2,630 times |
Joined on Jan 2011
@ Touring
|
#78
|
![]() |
2013-08-26
, 16:38
|
|
Posts: 201 |
Thanked: 63 times |
Joined on Aug 2010
@ india
|
#79
|
![]() |
2013-08-26
, 16:39
|
Posts: 2,076 |
Thanked: 3,268 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
|
#80
|
The Following User Says Thank You to szopin For This Useful Post: | ||
We can use those chips you mentioned. What we'll sacrifice by that is full compatibility with Fremantle and... price. If you're ok with paying above 1000 EUR for such smartphone and you can get ~500 more buyers to do that, then it can be produced - why not?
We have to keep in mind that this is community based project without any support from big gamers. We don't have Nokia's cash nor as many paid engineers as they have (or had :P). There's no Google behind us wanting to spread their platform. Price is going to be higher that in competition - that's for sure. But of course we can lower the difference with higher demand.
I still think that freedom GTA04, and now Neo900, can provide is worth higher price. It costs a bit, but it's an unique feature you won't get anywhere else.
Sebastian Krzyszkowiak - https://dosowisko.net/
Long term Openmoko supporter. Owner of two Neo Freerunners, a few N900s and some others too.
Future owner of the Neo900