Active Topics

 


Page 80 of 107 « First 707879 80 818290 Last »
Reply
Thread Tools
epninety's Avatar
epninety is offline epninety
2016-07-21 , 16:15
Posts: 269 | Thanked: 1,096 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ Hampshire, UK
#791
I made it 135.0 x 67.0 for the 'glass' itself, but I don't have a decent vernier here. Measured from the image I posted earlier I got 135.0 x 67.5.

Decent measurement tools and decent computer are both at home.

EDIT : Checked with a proper vernier and measuring the supplied plastic shield (because it's easier to define where the edge actually is) I get 135.3mm x 67.3mm. Shame I don't have access to a travelling microscope at work any more
Last edited by epninety; 2016-07-21 at 20:37.
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to epninety For This Useful Post:
mosen's Avatar
mosen is offline mosen
2016-07-21 , 21:24
Community Council | Posts: 1,669 | Thanked: 10,225 times | Joined on Nov 2014 @ Lower Rhine
#792
During measurement i also had the feeling that 135.5 x 67.5 is to much of a risc and possibly hard to apply.
So we should report 135 x 67 with 1mm corner radius to bedifol tomorrow to play safe and have some space to adjust?

I guess they can even work out a good result with the scan and exact outer dimension of the phone. But we will see.
__________________
Watch our weird watchfaces for mighty AsteroidOS
Performance comparison Video Sailfish 2.0 vs 1.1.9 vs 1.1.7
[MC eV] Maemo Community eV membership application please concider to join!
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to mosen For This Useful Post:
javispedro's Avatar
javispedro is offline javispedro
2016-07-22 , 00:07
Posts: 2,355 | Thanked: 5,249 times | Joined on Jan 2009 @ Barcelona
#793
Originally Posted by Fellfrosch View Post
Well the fairphone isn't that highend. Only the price is. But that has to be, otherwise they can't produce it fair. And to be honest I absolutly like the idea and I'm willing to pay more for this idea. Maybe you can gather a used one from ebay or somewhere else.
It's not about price, but rather about specs. I find no reason to get such a powerful processor when I'm mostly fine with the current performance on the Jolla, and would rather prefer to have a measly processor that sips battery life even when in use (since I usually disable suspend-on-screen-off and "run stuff" on the phone).

Obviously, if they managed to put a largeish processor and still keep decent battery life, then I have nothing to say...

The Jolla C seemed interesting because of the weaker processor in raw numbers, but it doesn't seem the battery life improves much...

Originally Posted by Bundyo View Post
OnePlus X looks okay and has a nice port. Plus Kimmoli probably needs a helping hand with it
However,
A) I would still need a primary phone,
B) I am still unsure of the business model behind ports.



And by the way, I got the Jolla C and yeah, it has neither a compass nor a gyroscope. Can't find a difference in performance compared to Sbj, and the kernel is pretty old too -- 3.10. Quite unimpressed so far.
Not worth losing the hwkb at all, at least for me.
Will try to use it for a day to evaluate sunlight screen readability and battery life.

I can also confirm it works with 256gb microSD cards, so the 32gb limitation in the tech specs is just the exfat crap.
Last edited by javispedro; 2016-07-22 at 00:21.
 

The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to javispedro For This Useful Post:
lal is offline lal
2016-07-22 , 02:31
Posts: 114 | Thanked: 381 times | Joined on Jan 2014
#794
I received the Jolla C Indian variant, AquaFish, today as well.

Looks decent and I am new to Sailfisf OS. Will comment once I use it for a while.
 

The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to lal For This Useful Post:
eson's Avatar
eson is offline eson
2016-07-22 , 04:44
Posts: 363 | Thanked: 1,375 times | Joined on Nov 2015 @ Sweden
#795
I f***ed up my J1 this morning, and I was so happy to have my Jolla C, that I think I'm going to do it again.
Last edited by eson; 2016-07-22 at 04:59.
 

The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to eson For This Useful Post:
Martinhsl68hw is offline Martinhsl68hw
2016-07-22 , 06:27
Posts: 45 | Thanked: 101 times | Joined on May 2011
#796
I'm finding the reception not as good as J1 - I am only getting 2 bars of 3G instead of 4 bars of 4G.... I have prefer 4G set
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Martinhsl68hw For This Useful Post:
ejjoman is offline ejjoman
2016-07-22 , 06:47
Posts: 114 | Thanked: 409 times | Joined on Jun 2011 @ Germany
#797
Do you have LTE @ 800MHz in your region?
If yes, see here: https://together.jolla.com/question/...-with-jolla-c/

They are currently working on a solution...
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to ejjoman For This Useful Post:
anidel's Avatar
anidel is offline anidel
2016-07-22 , 07:27
Posts: 1,743 | Thanked: 1,231 times | Joined on Jul 2006 @ Twickenham, UK
#798
Originally Posted by javispedro View Post
It's not about price, but rather about specs. I find no reason to get such a powerful processor when I'm mostly fine with the current performance on the Jolla, and would rather prefer to have a measly processor that sips battery life even when in use (since I usually disable suspend-on-screen-off and "run stuff" on the phone).

Obviously, if they managed to put a largeish processor and still keep decent battery life, then I have nothing to say...

The Jolla C seemed interesting because of the weaker processor in raw numbers, but it doesn't seem the battery life improves much...



However,
A) I would still need a primary phone,
B) I am still unsure of the business model behind ports.



And by the way, I got the Jolla C and yeah, it has neither a compass nor a gyroscope. Can't find a difference in performance compared to Sbj, and the kernel is pretty old too -- 3.10. Quite unimpressed so far.
Not worth losing the hwkb at all, at least for me.
Will try to use it for a day to evaluate sunlight screen readability and battery life.

I can also confirm it works with 256gb microSD cards, so the 32gb limitation in the tech specs is just the exfat crap.
Jolla C battery life so far has been excellent compared to the Jolla phone.
Performance wise, it's been a great improvement too. It is much snappier.
 

The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to anidel For This Useful Post:
r0kk3rz is offline r0kk3rz
2016-07-22 , 08:39
Posts: 440 | Thanked: 2,256 times | Joined on Jul 2014
#799
Originally Posted by lal View Post
I received the Jolla C Indian variant, AquaFish, today as well.

Looks decent and I am new to Sailfisf OS. Will comment once I use it for a while.
Does it have the partner screen on the home carousel? Or is it just Task Switcher and Events screen.
__________________
SirenSong v0.5
Like my work? buy me a beer
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to r0kk3rz For This Useful Post:
Eminem's Avatar
Eminem is offline Eminem
2016-07-22 , 08:45
Posts: 212 | Thanked: 184 times | Joined on May 2010 @ Sweden
#800
Originally Posted by r0kk3rz View Post
Does it have the partner screen on the home carousel? Or is it just Task Switcher and Events screen.
I think Aqua Fish got it. Jolla C not.
__________________
And the natural balance is restored to the universe
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Eminem For This Useful Post:
Reply
Page 80 of 107 « First 707879 80 818290 Last »

Tags
jolla c, sailfish os

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 19:02.

Contact Us - Home - Archive - Top