Active Topics

 



Notices
Page 82 of 84 « First 728081 82 8384
Reply
Thread Tools
rinigus is offline rinigus
2020-11-22 , 11:52
Posts: 1,414 | Thanked: 7,547 times | Joined on Aug 2016 @ Estonia
#811
Originally Posted by nonsuch View Post
Not sure I understood the above correctly, but I uninstalled OSM Scout Server (through Storeman).

This completely locked up the system.
journalctl read:
Code:
Nov 22 12:12:54 XperiaXA2-DualSIM systemd[32240]: osmscout-server.service: Failed at step EXEC spawning /usr/bin/harbour-osmscout-server: No such file or directory
Nov 22 12:12:54 XperiaXA2-DualSIM systemd[4808]: osmscout-server.service: Main process exited, code=exited, status=203/EXEC
Nov 22 12:12:54 XperiaXA2-DualSIM systemd[4808]: osmscout-server.service: Unit entered failed state.
Nov 22 12:12:54 XperiaXA2-DualSIM systemd[4808]: osmscout-server.service: Failed with result 'exit-code'.
Nov 22 12:12:54 XperiaXA2-DualSIM systemd[4808]: Started OSM Scout Server.
This repeated ~50 times per second.
A reboot was tricky (stayed on red LED, had to hold VolUp+Power), but after that everything was OK.

After reinstallation everything seems to be working fine (SFOS 3.4).
Just thought I'd report this.
I presume you had an old version and Pure Maps was activating it via systemd sockets. Any tips on limiting the rate are welcome - corresponding PR as well!
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to rinigus For This Useful Post:
olf's Avatar
olf is offline olf
2020-11-22 , 13:41
Posts: 304 | Thanked: 1,246 times | Joined on Aug 2015
#812
Originally Posted by pichlo View Post
<ot>
I have always been wondering: isn't Openrepos clever enough to offer multiple versions and let your device pick the one matching your setup? Why do I bother defining version dependencies in my packages?
</ot>
Originally Posted by rinigus View Post
pkcon || zypper are clever enough - [...]
... and all what is needed.

Originally Posted by rinigus View Post
It's just we don't have repos specific to SFOS versions.
... which are not needed, anyway.

For example, the recent Storeman and crypto-sdcard RPMs are provided in SFOS-version specific releases in a single RPM-repository.

I documented how to handle this (primarily for myself) in crypto-sdcard's "Release version format, RPM dependencies and Git workflow". Suggestions, enhancements, constructive criticism, etc. are welcome, as always.
Last edited by olf; 2020-11-22 at 14:51.
 

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to olf For This Useful Post:
pichlo's Avatar
pichlo is offline pichlo
2020-11-22 , 23:06
Posts: 6,447 | Thanked: 20,981 times | Joined on Sep 2012 @ UK
#813
Sorry a naive question from an old geezer with only a shallow understanding of Linux and its distribution systems.

Does it need to be SFOS-version specific? If let's say a patch updates let's say the SMS app version x.yy.zzz, isn't it a bit of an overkill to make it depend on a specific version of SFOS, rather than, more logically, on a specific version of the SMS app? Will pkcon/zypper not work it out in such a case?
__________________
Русский военный корабль, иди нахуй!
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to pichlo For This Useful Post:
nonsuch's Avatar
nonsuch is offline nonsuch
2020-11-23 , 07:53
Posts: 584 | Thanked: 1,550 times | Joined on Sep 2019
#814
Originally Posted by rinigus View Post
I presume you had an old version and Pure Maps was activating it via systemd sockets.
Strangely I don't think Pure Maps was running at that moment, I had only just booted the phone.
I gather from your comment that this is a known issue, maybe it was already mentioned elsewhere.

Any tips on limiting the rate are welcome - corresponding PR as well!
That wouldn't make it a OSM Scout server issue anymore, no?
Be that as it may, ~50 times a second seems too much, but otoh there might be a good reason for that.
__________________
N900 in 2020
SFOS in 2021
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to nonsuch For This Useful Post:
olf's Avatar
olf is offline olf
2020-11-23 , 16:11
Posts: 304 | Thanked: 1,246 times | Joined on Aug 2015
#815
Originally Posted by pichlo View Post
Sorry a naive question from an old geezer with only a shallow understanding of Linux and its distribution systems.

Does it need to be SFOS-version specific? If let's say a patch updates let's say the SMS app version x.yy.zzz, isn't it a bit of an overkill to make it depend on a specific version of SFOS, rather than, more logically, on a specific version of the SMS app? Will pkcon/zypper not work it out in such a case?
3 * No

(10chars)
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to olf For This Useful Post:
rinigus is offline rinigus
2020-11-23 , 16:35
Posts: 1,414 | Thanked: 7,547 times | Joined on Aug 2016 @ Estonia
#816
@olf: I must say it is fast becoming rather elaborate in terms of trying to support multiple SFOS versions with several packages. I prefer to offload this to the users and provide such support using OBS repos. There is limited time that has to be taken into account and, in this context, I prefer to distribute the workload instead of piling it all on myself.

@nonsuch: something has to access it to make it happen. It could be any other client that you could have been running (modRana, sports app). Don't know what else could it be. I guess that you had somehow a server version installed which could not be launched. Why, no idea. And systemd tried to launch it - many times. Alternative is that socket activation script was left behind after uninstall. But I would expect systemd to check for availability of executable before starting it.

Please file it as an issue, so I would remember to look into it.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to rinigus For This Useful Post:
ggabriel is offline ggabriel
2020-11-23 , 17:20
Posts: 728 | Thanked: 1,217 times | Joined on Oct 2011
#817
Originally Posted by pichlo View Post
Does it need to be SFOS-version specific? If let's say a patch updates let's say the SMS app version x.yy.zzz, isn't it a bit of an overkill to make it depend on a specific version of SFOS, rather than, more logically, on a specific version of the SMS app? Will pkcon/zypper not work it out in such a case?
Just to give you a bit more context: each piece of software will probably have dependencies and certain requirements (like syscall availability and such), hence each OS/distribution will package such software according to what is available for each OS/distribution.

You are right that if the SMS app changes "a != null" for "null != a", it will not affect those dependencies/requirements, and thus all packagers will find it trivial to update it; however, if an upgrade now requires the availability of e.g., the library to access sqlite databases, each OS/distro will have to adjust accordingly. OS2/Warp (*wink* *wink*) would find it probably impossible, while others will have it provided already and perhaps something like Gentoo Linux will just add a build dependency.

So, it isn't possible to do what you ask unless everybody agrees on a ubiquitous packaging system that does all this for you and works everywhere. I could quote a couple of examples where this "kind of" works at a generic level, but it will a) spark a lot of debate and b) will be very off topic.

Lastly, the examples above (dependencies/sys requirements) don't cover everything that is to be taken into account, there are a lot more things
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to ggabriel For This Useful Post:
rinigus is offline rinigus
2020-11-23 , 19:38
Posts: 1,414 | Thanked: 7,547 times | Joined on Aug 2016 @ Estonia
#818
@nonsuch: I have opened an issue https://github.com/rinigus/osmscout-server/issues/343

Re dependencies: fortunately, RPM SPEC deps are frequently detected automatically. So, large part of it is done for us. But to support multiple SFOS version from single repo, I would have to have all RPMs with unique names and ensure that they don't clash (sometimes same RPM can be installed in multiple SFOS versions).
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to rinigus For This Useful Post:
olf's Avatar
olf is offline olf
2020-11-23 , 19:42
Posts: 304 | Thanked: 1,246 times | Joined on Aug 2015
#819
Originally Posted by rinigus View Post
@olf: I must say it is fast becoming rather elaborate in terms of trying to support multiple SFOS versions with several packages. I prefer to offload this to the users and provide such support using OBS repos. There is limited time that has to be taken into account and, in this context, I prefer to distribute the workload instead of piling it all on myself.
That is well understandable and IMO reasonable.

I just wanted to point out, that it is technically feasible (which was @pichlo's original question), used in practice at Openrepos, and does not need multiple RPM-repositories.
Last edited by olf; 2020-11-23 at 22:19.
 

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to olf For This Useful Post:
rinigus is offline rinigus
2020-11-23 , 20:05
Posts: 1,414 | Thanked: 7,547 times | Joined on Aug 2016 @ Estonia
#820
Originally Posted by olf View Post
That is well understandable and IMO reasonable.

I just wanted to point out, that it is technically feasible (which was @pichlo's question, IIRC), used in practice at Openrepos, and does not need multiple RPM-repositories.
It was me who had an impression that you need multiple repos. Turned out to be wrong . Thanks for educating!
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to rinigus For This Useful Post:
Reply
Page 82 of 84 « First 728081 82 8384

Tags
geocoder, linux, offline maps, router, sailfish os, tiles

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 15:54.

Contact Us - Home - Archive - Top