SAABoy
|
2011-06-23
, 18:00
|
Posts: 604 |
Thanked: 108 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Phoenix, WA
|
#811
|
|
2011-06-23
, 18:04
|
Posts: 840 |
Thanked: 823 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#812
|
PS3 was $600 USD - more overseas - when later they reduced it to be competitive. PSP Go was the one I was referring to - smaller screen, no media, the games were download only and they were still full-priced (in some instances MORE expensive for some 1st party games) and it was more expensive than the better selling Nintendo DSi.
Both are sold at a loss - they put too much money (and faith) into the Cell processor and the chip foundry for that. Passed that along to us consumers as long as possible.
The Vaio X was a lower spec'd machine, sold at higher prices... all because it was thin (think MacBook Air, but worse priced).
Sony has done the same thing for almost all of their newest stuff for the last decade. Google TV, price drops continue (ok, they're just not selling). Vaio S series... price drops, too expensive for the specs. PSP handheld, sold at a loss, now almost $130 less than it was when it was originally sold (and finally selling well).
Sony phones, Sony computers, Sony BD-ROMs, they price stuff high... way too high at first.
|
2011-06-23
, 18:06
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#813
|
Well, I agree with most of the examples you gave, but some of the things you say have no bearing on the fact that they may be overpriced.
The Following User Says Thank You to For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-06-23
, 18:07
|
Posts: 840 |
Thanked: 823 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#814
|
|
2011-06-23
, 18:17
|
Posts: 840 |
Thanked: 823 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#815
|
|
2011-06-23
, 18:17
|
|
Posts: 4,708 |
Thanked: 4,649 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Bulgaria
|
#816
|
I just happen to notice.
From website above:
Update: Some people will say that its unfair to compare existing products with upcoming ones, and I agree. So for some perspective, as @coolkamio informs me on Twitter, iOS 5 manages a score of 304 + 9].
So it appears that IOS 5 has higher score unless the bonus points mean something else. FYI n9 had 257 + 14 bonus points. But honestly, I do no understand what the numbers really mean except higher is better. Perhaps someone can explain significance.
|
2011-06-23
, 18:19
|
Posts: 840 |
Thanked: 823 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#817
|
|
2011-06-23
, 18:20
|
Posts: 1,096 |
Thanked: 760 times |
Joined on Dec 2008
|
#818
|
The Following User Says Thank You to quipper8 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-06-23
, 18:25
|
Posts: 840 |
Thanked: 823 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#819
|
well it is an n9 with the aftermarket mugen extended battery and cover, which makes it a lot thicker
|
2011-06-23
, 18:25
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#820
|
Yes, seriously, and I say that with a straight face because other similar spec products in that sector were priced the same or even worse. Whether their strategy was good or not is another question entirely but if you bought a similar spec (which is the important point here, similar spec) product it was competitively priced you could argue even better priced than other products in that sector. Intrinsic and extrinsic value.
The Following User Says Thank You to For This Useful Post: | ||
Tags |
disapoint, eflop, epic win!, laggy interface, n9 rox, so much win, wateriswet, who cares, whyyyyy?????? |
|