![]() |
2012-05-23
, 11:04
|
Posts: 470 |
Thanked: 399 times |
Joined on Jul 2011
@ Croatia
|
#852
|
The downward trend began before Elop. Competition got too tough for Nokia to survive. Windows is not a bad choice, except that Symbian is disappearing faster than originally thought. Ordinary people don't read what CEOs blabber, they go and buy best devices in the shop. Symbian was a big loser and Nokia board new it and saw precipitous drops in figures before hiring Elop. They didnt act fast enough . Too complacent.
|
2012-05-23
, 14:52
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#853
|
you must be confusing...market share with sales numbers, which was declining because market was growing faster than symbian was...
![]() |
2012-05-23
, 16:59
|
Posts: 322 |
Thanked: 218 times |
Joined on Feb 2012
|
#854
|
nokia was selling more and more symbian devices every quarter even after elop came, right up to the elops anouncement that he is killing it, and that is a FACT
you must be confusing, like some other idiots, market share with sales numbers, which was declining because market was growing faster than symbian was, and that was a normal situation because symbian was such a giant and it is a fact that smaller you are the faster you can grow until some point which is around 15% for ios, 30% for android, 2% for WP and if elop didnt fu.ck up symbian it would have almost all of the rest still
![]() |
2012-05-24
, 06:50
|
|
Posts: 4,672 |
Thanked: 5,455 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Springfield, MA, USA
|
#855
|
Doesn't matter. Today Nokia has killed Symbian for good. I guess mr Elop didn't like the PureView 808, so he had to do something to kill it off.
|
2012-05-29
, 21:31
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#856
|
nokia was selling more and more symbian devices every quarter even after elop came, right up to the elops anouncement that he is killing it, and that is a FACT
you must be confusing, like some other idiots, market share with sales numbers, which was declining because market was growing faster than symbian was, and that was a normal situation because symbian was such a giant and it is a fact that smaller you are the faster you can grow until some point which is around 15% for ios, 30% for android, 2% for WP and if elop didnt fu.ck up symbian it would have almost all of the rest still
![]() |
2012-05-30
, 17:50
|
|
Posts: 1,625 |
Thanked: 998 times |
Joined on Aug 2010
|
#857
|
Dude, you dont see data that the Board and insiders see. They knew that Symbian was dead. They were grasping for alternatives. They were in many ways more visionary that RIM, which I think will belly up soon. NOKIA will survive, but by the slightest of margins. the stock will be $10 in 18 months, $20 in 24 months.
![]() |
2012-05-30
, 21:20
|
Posts: 207 |
Thanked: 552 times |
Joined on Jul 2011
|
#858
|
Dude, you dont see data that the Board and insiders see. They knew that Symbian was dead. They were grasping for alternatives.
|
2012-05-30
, 22:30
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#859
|
![]() |
2012-05-31
, 06:22
|
|
Posts: 4,672 |
Thanked: 5,455 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Springfield, MA, USA
|
#860
|
Dude, you dont see data that the Board and insiders see. They knew that Symbian was dead. They were grasping for alternatives. They were in many ways more visionary that RIM, which I think will belly up soon. NOKIA will survive, but by the slightest of margins. the stock will be $10 in 18 months, $20 in 24 months.
![]() |
Tags |
blame others, deluded fanboys, kidsbeingkids, lumiadork, ms will die, salesdroids, the elop flop, wp blows |
|
The downward trend began before Elop. Competition got too tough for Nokia to survive. Windows is not a bad choice, except that Symbian is disappearing faster than originally thought. Ordinary people don't read what CEOs blabber, they go and buy best devices in the shop. Symbian was a big loser and Nokia board new it and saw precipitous drops in figures before hiring Elop. They didnt act fast enough . Too complacent.